2021
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ generated silver nanoparticles embedded in polyethersulfone nanostructured membranes (Ag/PES) for antimicrobial decontamination of water

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The general performance of polymeric membranes is hindered by the build-up of microbial foulants both on the surface and inside the pores. This justifies the inclusion of antimicrobial agents within the membranes in order to circumvent the biofouling process. A nonsolvent-induced phase separation process was used to fabricate the membranes following the in situ reduction of silver (Ag) in the polymer dope solution. Fourier transform infrared, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning and transmission… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, small differences in loading of NPs lead to slight differences in contact angle which is also witnessed in Figure 6. These findings are also supported by Patala et al 69 who embedded Ag NPs in PES membranes. The minimum and maximum loading of Ag NPs was 0.05% and 0.25%, respectively, and their contact angle difference was 0.97°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, small differences in loading of NPs lead to slight differences in contact angle which is also witnessed in Figure 6. These findings are also supported by Patala et al 69 who embedded Ag NPs in PES membranes. The minimum and maximum loading of Ag NPs was 0.05% and 0.25%, respectively, and their contact angle difference was 0.97°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, small F I G U R E 5 Membranes' SEM images; left to right (cross-section 600x, cross-section 3000x, and top surface 3000x) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] differences in loading of NPs lead to slight differences in contact angle which is also witnessed in Figure 6. These findings are also supported by Patala et al 69 who embedded Ag NPs in PES membranes. The minimum and maximum loading of Ag NPs was 0.05% and 0.25%, respectively, and their contact angle difference was 0.97 .…”
Section: Afm and Contact Anglesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Some advantages of the use of nanostructures as additives in PES membranes include the enhancement of permeability, selectivity, high resistance to fouling, solute avoidance, processability, and high dimensional stability, [18,19] in addition to their antibacterial behavior against Gram (+) and Gram (À) microorganisms. [20,21] However, the poor nanoparticle dispersion into the membrane can generate a loss of selectivity and decrease their mechanical performance. [22,23] It has been claimed that carbon-derived nanostructures embedded in PES enhance the pure water flux, salts rejection, and heavy metals removal, attributed to the nanoparticles amount and their dispersion in the polymer matrix, [22,24,25] due to their enhanced surface reactive area, capable of adsorbing dyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%