In Situ Microfibril Structure in Incompatible Isotactic Polypropylene/Polylactic Acid Blends Controlled By Viscosity Ratio

Abstract

In situ microfibril structure can significantly improve the mechanical properties of incompatible blends. In this work, the in situ microfibrils were constructed in isotactic polypropylene/polylactic acid (iPP/PLA) blends by direct injection molding process, and the effect of viscosity ratio on the morphology was systematically analyzed. The results of scanning electron microscope and rheology show that the viscosity ratio plays a decisive role in the formation of in situ microfibrils. When the viscosity ratio of PLA/iPP is near 1, deformation and microfibrillation of PLA particles can be conducted due to the larger and more uniform distributed PLA domains as well as stronger viscous drag forces. However, irregular cylinders are observed when the viscosity ratio is far lower than 1. The poor deformation ability of PLA particles should be attributed to the much smaller size and weaker viscous drag forces. The well‐defined PLA microfibrils are conducive to avoid damage at the interface, and play a significant role in the enhancement of tensile strength and modulus. This work can simplify the traditional preparation process, construct in situ microfibrils directly by using conventional melt processing techniques and provide a new ideal for the high performance of incompatible polymer blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 60:832–840, 2020. © 2020 Society of Plastics Engineers

Polypropylene/poly(lactic acid)/carbon nanotube semi‐biodegradable nanocomposites: The effect of sequential mixing approach and compatibilization on morphology, rheology and electrical conductivity

“…Indeed, the addition of PP with PLA was reported to improve some important properties as processability, tensile strength and toughness when compared with neat PLA. 4 PP/PLA blends are incompatible, resulting in gross phase-separated morphology and poor mechanical performance owing to the lack of interfacial adhesion. The addition of some functional polymers as maleic anhydride-grafted PP, [5][6][7][8][9][10] glycidyl methacrylate-based terpolymers [11][12][13][14] and ethylene-butyl acrylate copolymer, 15 for example, has been adopted to improve these characteristics.…”

“…Among several conventional polymers, polypropylene (PP) has been chosen in several studies involving PLA‐based blends due to its processability, availability with low cost and good mechanical properties. Indeed, the addition of PP with PLA was reported to improve some important properties as processability, tensile strength and toughness when compared with neat PLA 4 . PP/PLA blends are incompatible, resulting in gross phase‐separated morphology and poor mechanical performance owing to the lack of interfacial adhesion.…”

Mapping the progress in natural fiber reinforced composites: Preparation, mechanical properties, and applications

“…Some examples of bio‐based matrices are polylactic acid, polyhydroxy alkanoate, polybutylene succinate, starch, and cellulose. [ 172,178,197–201 ]…”

“…Some examples of bio-based matrices are polylactic acid, polyhydroxy alkanoate, polybutylene succinate, starch, and cellulose. [172,178,[197][198][199][200][201] T A B L E 2 Chemical composition of natural fibers. To review the mechanical properties, 41 different composites have been selected.…”

The carbon nanotubes effects on the morphology and properties of poly(lactic) acid/poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) blends

“…In general, there are two factors that affect the position of nanoparticles, namely, thermodynamic factors [30] and kinetic migration factors (viscosity ratio, aspect ratio and mixing parameters of nanoparticles). [31,32] From a thermodynamic point of view, nanoparticles are usually found in components with large interactions of nanoparticles and polymer components. Therefore, nanoparticles may be selectively positioned in the dispersed phase, the continuous phase, or the interface between the two phases.…”