2022
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InVEST model analysis of the impacts of land use change on landscape pattern and habitat quality in the Xiaolangdi Reservoir area of the Yellow River basin, China

Abstract: Changes in land use impact the landscape pattern and habitat quality (LPHQ) of ecosystems. Since 1999, the Grain‐for‐Green Program (GGP) has brought dramatic changes in land use in Western China. Although many studies have reported positive contributions of the GGP to sediment reduction, the effects of the GGP on LPHQ remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the spatiotemporal characteristics of LPHQ in the Xiaolangdi Reservoir Area in China (XRAC) before and after GGP implementation (in 1990, 2000, 2010 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of above hot spot was mainly due to high altitudes or steep slopes conferred favorable habitat quality, which was associated with the accessibility of human activities. Human accessibility at high altitudes or steep slopes was limited, so it was unlikely to cause major interference with the original environment 53 , 54 . However, the formation of other hot spot in Yellow River Delta was due to protective human activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of above hot spot was mainly due to high altitudes or steep slopes conferred favorable habitat quality, which was associated with the accessibility of human activities. Human accessibility at high altitudes or steep slopes was limited, so it was unlikely to cause major interference with the original environment 53 , 54 . However, the formation of other hot spot in Yellow River Delta was due to protective human activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closer the value is to 0, the worse the habitat quality, indicating that the ecosystem is less able to support the survival and reproduction of species, which is detrimental to the maintenance of biodiversity in the region [ 43 ]. In this paper, HQ is calculated based on the sensitivity of different land use types and the intensity, location, and maximum impact distance of different threat sources using land use data and drawing on relevant studies [ 23 , 37 ]. The calculation equation is as follows: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this model is that the sensitivity of habitats to threat sources is taken into account when assessing habitat suitability [ 21 ], and it is not limited by study time, scale, and area. It is currently the most frequently applied model and is widely used for HQ assessment, spatial and temporal variability, and future prediction in cities [ 22 ], watersheds [ 23 ], nature reserves [ 24 ], and coastal zones [ 25 ]. In addition, in studies related to the effects of land use change on HQ, the models such as contribution index [ 26 ], bivariate spatial autocorrelation [ 27 ], ordinary least square (OLS) [ 28 ], geodetector [ 29 ], geographically weighted regression (GWR) [ 30 ], multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) [ 31 ] were mainly used to quantify and assess the relationship between land use change and habitat quality change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: R and W r are the numbers of threat sources and the weight of threat source r, Y r is the grid number of threats, r y is the stress level of grid X by the stress value of grid Y, and i rxy is the stress effect of stress factor R in Y on habitat grid unit X (Zhao L. et al, 2022). Generally, executing a habitat quality model requires the influence of distance and weights of stress factors and the compatibility and sensitivity of habitat components to each risk factor.…”
Section: Invest Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%