2017
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract: An expert recommendation conference was conducted to identify factors associated with adverse events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the goal of deriving expert recommendations for the reduction of biliary and vascular injury. Nineteen hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons from high-volume surgery centers in six countries comprised the Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD) Recommendations Group. Systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted. Using n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for conversion in the FF + LUS group was the laparoscopically undissectable brous tissue which disabled safe performance of the procedure (3 patients) whereas in the FF group these were unclear anatomy (2 patients), undissectable brous tissue (2 patients) and bleeding (1 patient). de nes three major causes of BDI: (1) technique associated with the surgeon's experience and performance, (2) pathology related to the extent of in ammation and (3) presence of anatomical variations whereas the most common reason of BDI is the misidenti cation of the common hepatic/bile duct instead of the cystic duct [10,13,14]. The safest way to complete cholecystectomy is to obtain CVS but the problems may arise in the case of in ammation in the region of Calot's triangle [10,13,14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for conversion in the FF + LUS group was the laparoscopically undissectable brous tissue which disabled safe performance of the procedure (3 patients) whereas in the FF group these were unclear anatomy (2 patients), undissectable brous tissue (2 patients) and bleeding (1 patient). de nes three major causes of BDI: (1) technique associated with the surgeon's experience and performance, (2) pathology related to the extent of in ammation and (3) presence of anatomical variations whereas the most common reason of BDI is the misidenti cation of the common hepatic/bile duct instead of the cystic duct [10,13,14]. The safest way to complete cholecystectomy is to obtain CVS but the problems may arise in the case of in ammation in the region of Calot's triangle [10,13,14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…de nes three major causes of BDI: (1) technique associated with the surgeon's experience and performance, (2) pathology related to the extent of in ammation and (3) presence of anatomical variations whereas the most common reason of BDI is the misidenti cation of the common hepatic/bile duct instead of the cystic duct [10,13,14]. The safest way to complete cholecystectomy is to obtain CVS but the problems may arise in the case of in ammation in the region of Calot's triangle [10,13,14]. CVS is not a dissection technique, but rather a technique of identi cation similar to the safety measures during hunting or ying [13,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, NIR fluorescence cholangiography (NIR-C) seems an accurate method to identify biliary structures and possibly to prevent bile duct injuries (1,8), with the advantages of being real-time, low-cost and radiation-free. NIR-C is based on the injection of a bile-excreted fluorophore [indocyanine green (ICG)], which becomes fluorescent upon excitation by a NIR light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%