2017
DOI: 10.1111/tid.12654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JC polyomavirus nephropathy, a rare cause of transplant dysfunction: Case report and review of literature

Abstract: JC polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (JC-PVAN) is a rare but challenging cause of renal dysfunction. We report JC-PVAN in a renal allograft recipient and highlight the obstacles in definitive diagnosis of this disease entity. A deceased-donor renal transplant recipient was diagnosed with JC polyomavirus nephritis 4 years after transplantation. Immunosuppressive agents were subsequently reduced, resulting in an initial stabilization of renal function. We present this interesting case and discuss the challenge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several case reports describe manifestations of JC‐PyVAN after KT, but most were detected in adults, in whom the seroprevalence is high and the risk of significant JCPyV exposure would be presumably lower or mitigated . In support of this notion, a recent case‐control study of the Swiss transplant cohort study reported a significant increase only in BKPyV‐specific IgG activity in BKPyV‐DNAemic patients, whereas their JCPyV‐IgG activities remained unchanged .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several case reports describe manifestations of JC‐PyVAN after KT, but most were detected in adults, in whom the seroprevalence is high and the risk of significant JCPyV exposure would be presumably lower or mitigated . In support of this notion, a recent case‐control study of the Swiss transplant cohort study reported a significant increase only in BKPyV‐specific IgG activity in BKPyV‐DNAemic patients, whereas their JCPyV‐IgG activities remained unchanged .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, the nOD of >0.100 of JCPyV‐IgG at a serum dilution of 1:200 was defined as positive. JCPyV‐specific IgM were measured as detailed and validated previously, whereby a nOD > 0.100 at 1:400 dilution was considered positive. Serologically significant exposure was defined as IgG seroconversion, or occurrence of JCPyV‐specific IgM, or as an increase of >0.5 nOD units in serially tested sera post‐transplant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a suspicion of JC virus nephropathy, there should be high urine JC viral loads in the absence of BK virus in either blood or urine along with SV40 positive staining and JC virus DNA in the biopsy, 1,5,6 as JC virus in the blood is usually low or undetectable. Interestingly, it seems that BK virus nephropathy often occurs earlier than JC virus nephropathy, usually within 1‐2 years of transplant, 1 while JC virus nephropathy has been reported further out from transplant, with cases reported at 4 years, 7 6 years, 8 and, in a pediatric case, 7 years after transplant 9 . Asymptomatic JC viremia has been documented in solid organ transplant recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tubulointerstitial nephritis due to JC polyomavirus (JCPyVAN) presents histologically with the same features as BKPyVAN but in comparison is exceeding rare . A diagnosis of JCPyVAN should be considered when histological features of BKPyVAN are present but BK viremia is negative .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Tubulointerstitial nephritis due to JC polyomavirus (JCPyVAN) presents histologically with the same features as BKPyVAN but in comparison is exceeding rare. [11][12][13] A diagnosis of JCPyVAN should be considered when histological features of BKPyVAN are present but BK viremia is negative. 12 The diagnosis can be confirmed with evaluation of JC viral loads (viremia, viruria) and also with performance of histological studies specific for the JC virus (ie, in situ hybridization).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%