2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LOBSTER: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical‐bonding analysis from projector‐augmented‐wave‐based density‐functional theory

Abstract: We present an update on recently developed methodology and functionality in the computer program LOBSTER (Local Orbital Basis Suite Towards Electronic-Structure Reconstruction) for chemical-bonding analysis in periodic systems. LOBSTER is based on an analytic projection from projector-augmented wave (PAW) densityfunctional theory (DFT) computations [J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2557, reconstructing chemical information in terms of local, auxiliary atomic orbitals and thereby opening the output of PAW-based DFT c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
452
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 783 publications
(457 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
452
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical bonding analyses using the crystal orbital overlap population (COOP) method and a projection onto local, atomcentered orbitals [48][49][50] were performed for relaxed structural snapshots of the Ge-rich amorphous phases, following an approach we have previously proposed for amorphous GeTe 46,47 . The COOP curves show no strong antibonding interaction at the Fermi level for both amorphous Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 and Ge 2 Sb 1 Te 2 ( Supplementary Figure 4), indicating reasonable chemical stability of the amorphous models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical bonding analyses using the crystal orbital overlap population (COOP) method and a projection onto local, atomcentered orbitals [48][49][50] were performed for relaxed structural snapshots of the Ge-rich amorphous phases, following an approach we have previously proposed for amorphous GeTe 46,47 . The COOP curves show no strong antibonding interaction at the Fermi level for both amorphous Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 and Ge 2 Sb 1 Te 2 ( Supplementary Figure 4), indicating reasonable chemical stability of the amorphous models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, we estimated the force acting on the 5-c atom, predicted by LDA-DFT (the reference in the a-C GAP), as a proxy for the stability of these 5-c complexes. On the other hand, we quantify the chemical bonding nature using crystal orbital overlap population (COOP) [74] and crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) [75] analyses, based on a local-orbital projection scheme as implemented in LOBSTER [76][77][78]. In brief, a self-consistent electronicstructure computation in the projector-augmented wave (PAW) framework [79] is carried out, here using VASP [80,81].…”
Section: Overcoordinated Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-consistent electronic wave function is then projected onto an auxiliary, atom-centered basis of 2s and 2p orbitals (following ideas proposed in Ref. 82), and the availability of local information allows the reconstruction of energy-and orbitalresolved chemical-bonding indicators [76][77][78]. The energy integration of COOP(E) up to the Fermi level yields a measure for the electron population associated with a given bond (positive values indicating stabilization), whereas the integration of COHP(E) gives an energy value (negative values indicating stabilization) [75].…”
Section: Overcoordinated Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For T' 2 N 2 (NCN) and T' 2 N(CN 3 ), the T'ÀN1 distance is significantly longer than the T' À N2 distance, so the existence of the isolated N 3À anion in T' 2 N 2 (NCN) and T' 2 N(CN 3 ) is quite obvious even from geometry. The strengths of the chemical bonds are directly quantified by the Integrated Crystal Orbital Hamilton Populations (ICOHP) as projected by LOBSTER, [30] plotted in Figure 4 b). For T' 2 N 2 (NCN) and T' 2 N(CN 3 ), the covalent part of the T'ÀN bonding is not too large, as expected for a metalnitrogen bond.…”
Section: Chemical Bonding and Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%