Long‐term follow‐up of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: Natural course of pure, heterogeneous, and real part‐solid ground‐glass nodules

Abstract

Background Previous studies have suggested the applicability of three classifications of subsolid nodules (SSNs). However, few studies have unraveled the natural history of the three types of SSNs. Methods A retrospective study from two medical centers between November 2007 and November 2017 was conducted to explore the long‐term follow‐up results of three different types of SSNs, which were divided into pure ground‐glass nodules (pGGNs), heterogeneous ground‐glass nodules (hGGNs), and real part‐solid nodules (rPSNs). Results A total of 306 consecutive patients, including 361 SSNs with long‐term follow‐up, were reviewed. The median growth times of pGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs were 7.7, 6.0, and 2.0 years, respectively. For pGGNs, the median period of development into rPSNs was 4.6 years, while that of hGGNs was 1.8 years, and the time from pGGNs to hGGNs was 3.1 years ( p < 0.05). In SSNs with an initial lung window consolidation tumor ratio (LW‐CTR) >0.5 and mediastinum window (MW)‐CTR >0.2, all cases with growth were identified within 5 years. Meanwhile, in SSNs whose LW‐CTR and MW‐CTR were 0, it took over 5 years to detect nodular growth. Pathologically, 90.6% of initial SSNs with LW‐CTR >0 were invasive carcinomas (invasive adenocarcinoma and micro‐invasive adenocarcinoma). Among patients with rPSNs in the initial state, 100.0% of the final pathological results were invasive carcinoma. Cox regression showed that age ( p = 0.038), initial maximal diameter ( p < 0.001), and LW‐CTR ( p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for SSN growth. Conclusions pGGNs, hGGNs, and rPSNs have significantly different natural histories. Age, initial nodule diameter, and LW‐CTR are important risk factors for SSN growth.

Surveillance of subsolid nodules avoids unnecessary resections in lung cancer screening: long-term results of the prospective BioMILD trial

“…These findings suggest that SSNs should be followed up until the volunteers may benefit from intervention, in line with findings from the literature that favour longterm monitoring of SSNs to prevent misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis of clinically significant LC [34,35]. Since a lower incidence of growth has been suggested for stable SSNs (e.g., after 2 or more years of stability [35][36][37][38]), further analyses may help optimize SSN management by evaluating individual nodule trajectories to personalize LDCT screening intervals [39].…”

Correlation of CT features of lung adenocarcinoma with sex and age

“…Studies indicate that a GGO nodule initially increases in size, followed by the appearance and subsequent enlargement of a solid portion within the lesion 20 . Lesions transitioning from pGGO to mGGO or from mGGO to solid exhibit rapid size increases 10 , 21 , 22 . The volume doubling time (VDT) for pGGOs is approximately 600 to 900 days; for part-solid GGOs, it ranges from 300 to 450 days 23 ; and for solid nodules, it is about 149 days 24 .…”