2013
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercator: a fast and simple web server for genome scale functional annotation of plant sequence data

Abstract: Next-generation technologies generate an overwhelming amount of gene sequence data. Efficient annotation tools are required to make these data amenable to functional genomics analyses. The Mercator pipeline automatically assigns functional terms to protein or nucleotide sequences. It uses the MapMan 'BIN' ontology, which is tailored for functional annotation of plant 'omics' data. The classification procedure performs parallel sequence searches against reference databases, compiles the results and computes the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
439
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
439
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass spectrometry results were further annotated using Mercator (Lohse et al, 2014) and WebMGA (Kegg and Kog; Wu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Annotation Of Mass Spectrometry Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass spectrometry results were further annotated using Mercator (Lohse et al, 2014) and WebMGA (Kegg and Kog; Wu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Annotation Of Mass Spectrometry Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to using established techniques such as BUSCO, comparing the whole plant gene set data against the backdrop of closely related species promises to become a versatile tool (Bolger et al, 2017) and the comparison can be largely automated (Lohse et al, 2014;Lyons and Freeling, 2008).…”
Section: Genome Assemblies Made Cheaper and Easiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GO terms were augmented with Interpro annotations using ANNEX (Myhre et al 2006). MapMan bins were annotated with Mercator (Lohse et al 2014). Interspersed repeats and low-complexity regions were identified using RepeatMasker (version 4.0.3) (Smit et al 2013(Smit et al -2015.…”
Section: Feature Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%