2020
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil–water transport in clay‐hosted nanopores: Effects of long‐range electrostatic forces

Abstract: Charged clay surfaces can impact the storage and mobility of hydrocarbon and water mixtures. Here, we use equilibrium molecular dynamics (MD) and nonequilibrium MD simulations to investigate hydrocarbon‐water mixtures and their transport in slit‐shaped illite nanopores. We construct two illite pore models with different surface chemistries: potassium–hydroxyl (PH) and hydroxyl–hydroxyl (HH) structures. In HH nanopore, we observe water adsorption on the clay surfaces. In PH nanopores, however, we observe the fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption sites of porous adsorbents had two sources: one was the inorganic MDAPT clay, and the other was the sulfonic acid group of AMPS. Among them, MDAPT clay could interact with MB via nanopore structure and required no activation energy, whereas the sulfonic acid group for MB adsorption was driven by concentration mass transfer and required a large activation energy . When the MB concentration was low, MB only was absorbed by the porous adsorbent at the surface due to the lower mass transfer driving force.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption sites of porous adsorbents had two sources: one was the inorganic MDAPT clay, and the other was the sulfonic acid group of AMPS. Among them, MDAPT clay could interact with MB via nanopore structure and required no activation energy, whereas the sulfonic acid group for MB adsorption was driven by concentration mass transfer and required a large activation energy . When the MB concentration was low, MB only was absorbed by the porous adsorbent at the surface due to the lower mass transfer driving force.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, a slit-shaped Illite pore-throat model filled with oil–brine mixtures was constructed (Figure ). The mineral framework with 4 nm throat and 8 nm pore was built by replicating unit cells of Illite (space group: C 2/ m , a = 5.193 Å, b = 8.994 Å, c = 10.204 Å, α = 90°, β = 101.77° and γ = 90°) with chemical formula of K­[Si 7 Al]­(Al 4 )­O 20 (OH) 4 . , Illite was selected to construct pore walls since it is the typical representation of clay in shale. The isomorphic substitutions in the tetrahedral sheets follow Loewenstein’s rule . The Illite framework was cleaved along the (010) plane to construct the pore-throat system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, a slit-shaped Illite porethroat model filled with oil−brine mixtures was constructed (Figure 1). The mineral framework with 4 nm throat and 8 nm pore was built by replicating unit cells of Illite 54 55,56 Illite was selected to construct pore walls since it is the typical representation of clay in shale. 57−59 The isomorphic substitutions in the tetrahedral sheets follow Loewenstein's rule.…”
Section: ■ Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, under the control of nanoconfined impact, water viscosity inside nanopores behaves differently, compared with that in bulk state 30,31,32 . Stemming from the fluid‐surface interactions, additional force, exerted by the surface as a form 33 of attraction or repulsion term, is imposed on nanoconfined water molecule, which depends on the distance between water molecules and surface. In the case of hydrophilic surface, water molecules, adjacent to the surface, tend to adsorb or stick on surface, and the adsorption thickness can reach up to 2–3 molecular diameter as reported 34–36 .…”
Section: Mathematic Model For Optimal Nanocone Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%