<scp>Public–private</scp> entrepreneurial financing partnership model in Nigeria

Ochinanwata, Nonso; Ezepue, Patrick Oseloka; Nwankwo, Theodore Chinonso; Ochinanwata, Chinedu; Igwe, Paul Agu

doi:10.1002/tie.22194

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Adopting supportive regulatory frameworks is a transferable best practice crucial for fostering entrepreneurial ecosystems (Bradley, et. al., 2021, Ochinanwata, et. al., 2021.…”

Section: Lessons Learned and Transferable Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Usa: A Comparative Review With European Models

Sunday Tubokirifuruar Tula,

Onyeka Chrisanctus Ofodile,

Chinwe Chinzo Okoye

et al. 2024

Int. j. manag. entrep. res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Review provides a concise overview of a comparative review exploring entrepreneurial ecosystems in the United States and their counterparts in Europe. The examination seeks to identify key characteristics, strengths, and challenges within these ecosystems, shedding light on the factors influencing entrepreneurship on both sides of the Atlantic. The entrepreneurial landscape in the United States has long been considered a global benchmark, characterized by a dynamic ecosystem that nurtures innovation, risk-taking, and venture capital. This review engages in a comparative analysis, juxtaposing the American entrepreneurial ecosystem with models prevalent in Europe. It delves into the structural elements, support mechanisms, and cultural factors that shape and differentiate these ecosystems. In the USA, a robust ecosystem is marked by a convergence of factors such as world-class universities, a prolific venture capital landscape, and a culture that embraces risk and failure as integral to the entrepreneurial journey. The review scrutinizes how these elements contribute to the rapid formation and scaling of startups, fostering a culture of innovation and resilience. Contrastingly, European entrepreneurial ecosystems exhibit a diverse range of models influenced by regional variations in culture, regulatory environments, and historical contexts. The analysis probes into the strengths and challenges inherent in these ecosystems, exploring how they navigate issues such as access to capital, risk aversion, and the balance between innovation and regulatory frameworks. The comparative review aims to distill insights that can inform policymakers, entrepreneurs, and stakeholders on both sides of the Atlantic. By understanding the nuances of each ecosystem, the goal is to identify transferable best practices, foster cross-cultural collaborations, and contribute to the evolution of more resilient and globally competitive entrepreneurial environments. In summary, this review illuminates the distinct characteristics of entrepreneurial ecosystems in the USA and Europe, offering a comparative lens to understand the intricacies that drive innovation and economic growth. As the global landscape continues to evolve, this review serves as a valuable resource for shaping policies, fostering collaboration, and advancing the collective understanding of what propels successful entrepreneurship in diverse and dynamic contexts. Keywords: Entrepreneurial, Ecosystem, European, Models, Policies.

show abstract

“…Adopting supportive regulatory frameworks is a transferable best practice crucial for fostering entrepreneurial ecosystems (Bradley, et. al., 2021, Ochinanwata, et. al., 2021.…”

Section: Lessons Learned and Transferable Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Usa: A Comparative Review With European Models

Sunday Tubokirifuruar Tula,

Onyeka Chrisanctus Ofodile,

Chinwe Chinzo Okoye

et al. 2024

Int. j. manag. entrep. res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Into the small business context, scholars have highlighted the digitization and technology adoption as a strategic competitive factor for survival and growth (Akpan and Ibidunni 2021). However, SME's resources (e.g., knowledge and funding) are frequently limited (Irimiás and Mitev 2020;Ochinanwata et al 2021) and, thus, the ability to innovate through the use of ICT, which enhances the efficient use of resources and waste reduction and supports sustainable development, is often constrained (Irimiás and Mitev 2020). 4.2.2.…”

Section: Cluster 1 (Blue Cluster): Innovation and Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The State of the Art and Research Agenda

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital technologies have changed and disrupted the dynamics of the economy and society as a whole, offering new opportunities for entrepreneurs with potential impact on economic, environmental, and social value creation. This paper examines the scientific research on digital entrepreneurship (DE) and sustainability based on data from Scopus database. The main purpose is to identify both the predominant themes and further research opportunities to this topic. This study uses a bibliometric analysis, analyzing and synthesizing research on DE and sustainability, based on a total of 58 publications. Co-word analysis used to identify the conceptual structure reveals three thematic clusters: (1) innovation and entrepreneurship, (2) digital transformation: strategy and business models, and (3) sustainability and sustainable development goals. For each thematic cluster, the most significant contributions are presented. Further, this paper offers a future research agenda and holds significant implications for the theory and practice of the different subtopics of DE and sustainability.

show abstract

“…SMEs have an extraordinary influence on a country's economy, both developed and developing countries. Micro, small, and medium enterprises (SMEs) certainly play an important role in supporting the economy in a better direction (Ochinanwata et al, 2021). In both developed and developing countries, it turns out that SMEs are the largest contributor to the formation or growth of the gross domestic population (GDP) and contribute the most to employment than large businesses, this shows the importance of SMEs for the country's economy (Franco & Haase, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success Model Partnership Program SME At PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III

Junaidi

Lubis²,

Effendi³

2023

jrssem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Small medium enterprises is one of the business units that help the country a lot in reducing the unemployment rate. This sector makes a major contribution in supporting the national economy. Real steps and efforts are needed to support and increase the power of SMEs. The main objective of this study is to determine the direct and indirect effects of HR experience, capital, knowledge, social networks, social media, perceived customer benefits, and perceived competitive value on the performance of SMEs through partnership programs. The approach in this research is causal research (cause and effect). The population in this study is the SME business actor who are fostered at PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III, with total of 243 SME business actors. While the sampling technique used a saturated sample where 243 SMEs were sampled in this study. Data collection techniques used a questionnaire with an ordinal measurement scale. Data analysis used AMOS based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results showed that the direct experience of human resources, capital, social networks, social media, and perceived customer benefits had a significant effect on the partnership program, while knowledge was not significant for the partnership program. The results showed that the direct experience of human resources, capital, social networks, social media, perceived customer benefits, and perceived competitive value had a significant effect on the performance of SMEs, while knowledge was not significant on the performance of SMEs. Indirectly the experience of human resources, capital, knowledge, social networks, social media, perceived customer benefits and perceived competitive value had a significant effect on the performance of SMEs through partnership programs.

show abstract

Public–private entrepreneurial financing partnership model in Nigeria

Cited by 9 publications

References 52 publications

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Usa: A Comparative Review With European Models

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Usa: A Comparative Review With European Models

Digital Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The State of the Art and Research Agenda

Success Model Partnership Program SME At PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About