Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy 2001
DOI: 10.1002/0470027320.s0105m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman Spectroscopy of Gases

Abstract: The sections in this article are Introduction Spontaneous R aman Spectroscopy High‐Resolution Rotation–Vibration Spectra Use of Interferometers R aman Line Widths Intensity Alternation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raman spectroscopy monitors the vibrations of gas, liquid and solid samples 23–25. H 2 O is a relatively weak Raman scatterer.…”
Section: Techniques For Studying Protein Foldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raman spectroscopy monitors the vibrations of gas, liquid and solid samples 23–25. H 2 O is a relatively weak Raman scatterer.…”
Section: Techniques For Studying Protein Foldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Raman spectroscopy monitors the vibrations of gas, liquid, and solid samples. [23][24][25] H 2 O is a relatively weak Raman scatterer. This enables Raman studies of biological molecules in H 2 O. Raman spectroscopy is an inelastic light-scattering phenomenon where the incident electromagnetic field interacts with a molecule such that there is an exchange of a quantum of vibrational energy between the two, resulting in a vibrational frequency difference between the incident and scattered light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for all of these implementations, the measurements have been limited to nighttime due to the fact that the Raman signal from liquid water is generally weaker than that from water vapor and covers a spectrum more than an order of magnitude wider ('5 versus 0.3 nm). The liquid water signals are generally weaker despite a cross section approximately 5 times higher (Weber 1979;Slusher and Derr 1975) than water vapor because of the typically lower number density of liquid versus vapor in a cloud. The channel characteristics are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: ) Liquid Water Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%