2016
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

swinger: a user‐friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information

Abstract: Captive breeding programmes are often a necessity for the continued persistence of a population or species. They typically have the goal of maintaining genetic diversity and minimizing inbreeding. However, most captive breeding programmes have been based on the assumption that the founding breeders are unrelated and outbred, even though in situ anthropogenic impacts often mean these founders may have high relatedness and substantial inbreeding. In addition, polygamous group-breeding species in captivity often … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean IR was estimated as −0.61 with a range of −0.43 to 0.23 (Table ). Following the parameter selection methodology of Sandoval‐Castillo et al () we obtained one list of 12 females and 13 males with an average PR of −0.075 and a mean IR of −0.45.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean IR was estimated as −0.61 with a range of −0.43 to 0.23 (Table ). Following the parameter selection methodology of Sandoval‐Castillo et al () we obtained one list of 12 females and 13 males with an average PR of −0.075 and a mean IR of −0.45.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our assurance colony management strategy depends on minimizing the average PR across the group and IR of individuals included in the group. Therefore, we ran SWINGER (Sandoval‐Castillo et al, ), utilizing the IR table incorporating sex information of the individuals and the PR table. The threshold values for maximum IR and maximum PR were both set to average values of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wild‐to‐wild releases also generally show greater rates of success (Christie, Marine, French, & Blouin, ; Snyder et al, ). If there is sufficient time before demographic collapse (Woodruff, ), improvements in the wild‐to‐wild release could include genetic assessment of wild individuals (or populations) prior to translocation to identify the optimal strategy for selection of founder individuals (Miller et al, 2017; Sandoval‐Castillo et al, ). If the source population is not robust enough to support wild‐to‐wild translocation, captive breeding may be required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New Computer Programs that are expected to become broadly utilized include the program SWINGER (Sandoval‐Castillo et al., ) that determines optimal breeding groups to reduce relatedness and maximize diversity in supportive breeding programmes, the package HYBRIDDETECTIVE (Wringe, Stanley, Jeffery, Anderson, & Bradbury, ) that detects hybridization in nature and a package called TREESPACE (Jombart, Kendall, Almagro‐Garcia, & Colijn, ) that explores multiple phylogenetic estimates to represent the most informative trees. Computer programs continue to be published as “free access” to make them broadly available to the community.…”
Section: State Of the Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%