Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X ‐Ray Photoelectron and Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Abstract: The sections in this article are\ud Introduction\ud X-Ray and UV Photoelectron Spectroscopy\ud Auger Electron Spectroscopy\ud Surface Sensitivity\ud Reference Level\ud Chemical Shifts in XPS and AES\ud Wagner Plots\ud Thermochemical Approach\ud Illustrative Examples of Application of XPS and AES-XAES to Heterogeneous Catalysi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1:3 and binding energies (183.4 and 184.9 eV) close to those reported for zirconium suboxide and ZrO 2 . , The P 2p peak was also fitted with two contributions at 133.1 and 135.4 eV with relative intensities in a 1:4 ratio. These values are in the binding energy ranges reported for CPO 3 , PO 4 , HPO 4 , and H 2 PO 4 units. , As there is essentially no nitrogen in the XPS spectrum, it can be concluded that no zirconium phosphonate is present, and these two peaks likely correspond to PO 4 and H 2 PO 4 /HPO 4 environments. This assignment is consistent with the broad absorption in the FT-IR spectrum at 960–1250 cm –1 , characteristic of phosphate groups (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1:3 and binding energies (183.4 and 184.9 eV) close to those reported for zirconium suboxide and ZrO 2 . , The P 2p peak was also fitted with two contributions at 133.1 and 135.4 eV with relative intensities in a 1:4 ratio. These values are in the binding energy ranges reported for CPO 3 , PO 4 , HPO 4 , and H 2 PO 4 units. , As there is essentially no nitrogen in the XPS spectrum, it can be concluded that no zirconium phosphonate is present, and these two peaks likely correspond to PO 4 and H 2 PO 4 /HPO 4 environments. This assignment is consistent with the broad absorption in the FT-IR spectrum at 960–1250 cm –1 , characteristic of phosphate groups (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These values are in the binding energy ranges reported for CPO 3 , PO 4 , HPO 4 , and H 2 PO 4 units. 48,49 As there is essentially no nitrogen in the XPS spectrum, it can be concluded that no zirconium phosphonate is present, and these two peaks likely correspond to PO 4 and H 2 PO 4 /HPO 4 environments. This assignment is consistent with the broad absorption in the FT-IR spectrum at 960−1250 cm −1 , characteristic of phosphate groups (Figure S5).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In favor of their argument is the good agreement between the gain in N 2 O-RFC and loss in H 2 -TPR (Figure 72c), and their interpretation of the Zn L 3 M 4.5 M 4. 5 Auger peaks (see sections 8.3 and 11.4.2). The Auger peak shows a shoulder at around 495 eV that increases with increasing H 2 -treatment pressure, which is used as evidence for the presence of metallic Zn.…”
Section: Conclude: "[T]here Is a Relationship Between The N 2 O-rfc S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that the Review discusses numerous characterization tools (e.g., X-ray and neutron diffraction, X-ray spectroscopy, and vibrational spectroscopies), and the reader will benefit from a basic understanding of these commonly used techniques. We recommend the interested reader to introductory literature regarding these various techniques. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%