2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrambled but valid? The scrambled sentences task as a measure of interpretation biases in psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that the SST may be used to provide evidence on the depressive disposition of individuals and their cognition patterns (for review, see Würtz et al, 2022). The aim of the present work was to develop a variant of the SST capable to elicit a pattern of cognitions associated with high dark personality scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that the SST may be used to provide evidence on the depressive disposition of individuals and their cognition patterns (for review, see Würtz et al, 2022). The aim of the present work was to develop a variant of the SST capable to elicit a pattern of cognitions associated with high dark personality scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies on this topic focused on an attentional bias to health threat stimuli (Shi et al, 2022). Interpretation bias, the tendency to judge ambiguous information as negative or threatening (Hirsch, Meeten, Krahé, & Reeder, 2016; Würtz et al, 2022), is also commonly seen in health anxiety. This type of bias is evident in particularly negative explanations for physical concerns, such as ‘if I have a headache, I have a brain tumor’ (Smeets, de Jong, & Mayer, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scrambled sentences task [ 27 ] was administered to assess change in negative interpretation bias from pre- to post-ASST. The current version was developed to assess interpretation bias in adolescents [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%