Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources

Abstract

We investigate uncertainties about conventional petroleum resources and substitutes for conventional petroleum, focusing on the impact of these uncertainties on future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We use examples from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios as a baseline for comparison. The studied uncertainties include, (1) uncertainty in emissions factors for petroleum substitutes, (2) uncertainties resulting from poor knowledge of the amount of remaining conventional petroleum, and (3) uncertainties about the amount of production of petroleum substitutes from natural gas and coal feedstocks. We find that the potential effects of a transition to petroleum substitutes on GHG emissions are significant. A transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources such as tar sands or coal-to-liquids synfuels could raise upstream GHG emissions by several gigatonnes of carbon (GtC) per year by mid-century unless mitigation steps are taken.

Exploitation of Unconventional Fossil Fuels: Enhanced Greenhouse Gas Emissions

“…Production of fossil fuels from unconventional sources creates more greenhouse gases than from conventional sources. Previous work by Brandt and Ferrell (2007), using IPCC scenarios, found significant potential impacts on GHG's from the substitution of unconventional oil products for conventional oil. This work examines the increased reliance on unconventional oil and natural gas to meet growing energy demands, and the impact on GHG emissions if increasing demand for fuel is met by unconventional sources with higher carbon intensity.…”

Dilemmas for China: Energy, Economy and Environment

“…Depletion of conventional fossil fuels can potentially trigger increased economic pressure to develop unconventional hydrocarbon resources, ranging from shale gas to oil sands. However, the EROI is less for these resources, and hence, the carbon footprint is also higher than more conventional hydrocarbon sources, making the emission problem even worse [48]. It is likely that unconventional oil and gas will be affected by future climate change mitigation initiatives [49].…”

Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science

“…Besides combustion emissions, life cycle emissions estimates for gasoline generally include upstream emissions in gasoline production primarily from crude oil recovery, refinery emissions, and flaring losses. 47,48 Excluded are emissions due to military security associated with the acquisition of Middle Eastern petroleum, changes in the composition of petroleum supplies toward more GHGintensive fuels, and other additional emissions from petroleum extraction, refining, and transportation. 49 It is clear that a portion of US military expenditures and associated GHG emissions are related to the protection of oil exports from the Middle East.…”

“…48 Global conventional crude oil production is projected to remain relatively constant over 2007-2030, as increases in new capacity are offset by declines from existing fields. 57 The bulk of the increase in global oil production will come from natural gas liquids (e.g., propane) and unconventional resources and technologies, primarily tar sands.…”