2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scratch resistance of cellulosic, synthetic, polyurethane, waterborne, and acid-hardening varnishes used on woods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of scratch resistance decreased for all the four wood species across all the treatment combinations (Table 3). These results were in accordance with earlier experiments conducted by Keskin et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Values of scratch resistance decreased for all the four wood species across all the treatment combinations (Table 3). These results were in accordance with earlier experiments conducted by Keskin et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The resistance of water-based polish is lower than that of solvent-based varnishes (Smith and Kimball, 2008;Keskin et al, 2010;Forsgren, 2006;Soucek and Johansson, 2012). Therefore, solvent-based polish is preferred despite being harmful (De Hek et al, 1998;Weissenborn and Motiejauskaite, 2000).…”
Section: Adhesion Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water-based polyurethane coatings are not only low-cost, safe and environmentally friendly but also have good low-temperature film-forming properties, high-temperature retack resistance, and high wear resistance, etc. [14][15][16][17][18]. The research results of Pan et al [19] show that water-based polyurethane's (waterborne polyurethane, WPU) adhesion of the coating is much better than that of the acrylic resin (PA) emulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%