I extend thanks first to Terry Klein, George Miller, and Sherene Baugher for inviting me to participate in the 1997 Council for Northeast historical Archaeology workshop and 1998 session on the archaeology of agricultural places. All who attended and contributed their voices to the dialogue have helped me refine and revise my own ideas about the purpose and practice of historical archaeology that extends well beyond the context of the 19th and earl 20th-century farm. Reviewers David Grettler and Leslie Stewart-Abernathy and editor Ann-Eliza Lewis encouraged me to clarify the murky points in my thinking and writing. My colleagues in Delaware historical archaeology have produced model studies of 19th and early 20th-century agricultural places that have challenged us all to ask new questions, collect new kinds of data, present our findings in new ways, and explore new practice, comparative analysis. For the fine work on the Buchanan/Moffett, Cazier, and Stump sites upon which I rely so heavily in this paper, I especially thank those projects' archaeologists, Wade Catts, Jay Custer, David Grettle, Angela Hoseth, Michael Scholl, and Rebecca Tinsman. Alice Guerrant, historical archaeologist for the Delaware State Historic Preservation Office, contributed an essential dosage of "management reality" during preparation of the state plan for historical archaeological resources and the historic contexts for an archaeology of 19th and 20th-century agriculture that I believe enrichd both documents. I thank the Delaware Department of Transportation, and archaeologist Kevin Cunningham, and the University of Delaware Center for Archaeological Research, and its Director, Jay Custer, for sponsoring the archaeological investigations of the Buchanan/Moffett, Cazier, and Stump sites, and for their assistance with and permission to reproduce images from the site reports. The University of Tennessee Press will publish expanded versions of discussions in this article; I thank the Press for granting permission to publish this material here. I concluded by reminding the reader that I alone am responsible for any errors of omission or commission in the interpretations presented here.This article is available in Northeast Historical Archaeology: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol31/iss1/8