2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b04589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screen-Printing of a Highly Conductive Graphene Ink for Flexible Printed Electronics

Abstract: Conductive inks for the future printed electronics should have the following merits: high conductivity, flexibility, low cost, and compatibility with wide range of substrates. However, the state-of-the-art conductive inks based on metal nanoparticles are high in cost and poor in flexibility. Herein, we reported a highly conductive, low cost, and super flexible ink based on graphene nanoplatelets. The graphene ink has been screen-printed on plastic and paper substrates. Combined with postprinting treatments inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
159
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After undergoing 2000 cycles, the initial retention rate of the specific capacitance is about 83.7%, which displays good cycling stability for the CNFs/RGO 12 film. In addition, as a flexible conductive material, the effect of number of bends on capacitance was investigated by bending the CNFs/RGO12 film 200 times with a constant bending radius of 4 mm [ 60 ], and the measured results indicate that its capacitance did not change much, which is shown in Figure 7 f.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After undergoing 2000 cycles, the initial retention rate of the specific capacitance is about 83.7%, which displays good cycling stability for the CNFs/RGO 12 film. In addition, as a flexible conductive material, the effect of number of bends on capacitance was investigated by bending the CNFs/RGO12 film 200 times with a constant bending radius of 4 mm [ 60 ], and the measured results indicate that its capacitance did not change much, which is shown in Figure 7 f.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 115 ] For inkjet printing and screen‐printing, graphene, graphene‐like materials (i.e., rGO) and CNT are typically dispersed in a solvent that, much like metal nanoparticle‐based inks, require an organic binder or stabilizing agent to prevent agglomeration. [ 116 ] The organics must be removed after printing to restore the conductivity, typically by thermal annealing. [ 117 ] In a recent study, researchers investigated an alternative to thermal annealing by treating screen‐printed rGO ink using an atmospheric pressure N 2 plasma.…”
Section: Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Components Capacitance mF cm -2 Ni3V2O8@PANI 30 585 Annealed carbon cloth 31 2,900 Ni(OH)2/C/Cu // Mn3O4/C/Cu 32 216 ERG on paper (this work) 350 Activated carbon (AC) on polyimide film 33 35 Graphene/AC on polyimide film 19 37 Graphene on polyimide film 19 8 MnCo2O4 hollow spheres on carbon fibres 34 800 P3MT/HACNT on PDMS 35 3,100 HACNT on PDMS 21 750 Buckypaper on PDMS 21 250 Graphene-graphite/PU 36 16 Please do not adjust margins Please do not adjust margins For instance, any square coating with this resistance dissipates 1.3 watt only, under a 15 A current. If the voltage fed to the circuit is 120 V, the power dissipated in the coating square is less than 0.1%.…”
Section: Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%