2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.045132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screened Coulomb interaction of localized electrons in solids from first principles

Abstract: We report the implementation of a first-principles approach for calculating the screened Coulomb and exchange energies for localized electrons in solids. Our method is based on the pseudopotential plane wave formalism. The localized orbitals are represented by maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWF), and the screening effects are calculated within the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA). As first applications of this new development, we investigate the on-site Coulomb U and exchange J for the 3d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the bands are completely entangled or if one defines Wannier functions |W Rσ km from a larger energy window, then the preceding assumption of Eq. (5) cannot be made 26,33 and some authors have proposed the more general assumption 31,35 : Then, the values of the famous Hubbard U and Hund J are simply extracted by taking the average among the considered localized orbitals: (8) Note that this definition of U is also sometimes referred to as the F 0 Slater integral. We emphasize that this definition is different from the average of the diagonal elements of the Coulomb interaction matrix…”
Section: The Constrained Rpa Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the bands are completely entangled or if one defines Wannier functions |W Rσ km from a larger energy window, then the preceding assumption of Eq. (5) cannot be made 26,33 and some authors have proposed the more general assumption 31,35 : Then, the values of the famous Hubbard U and Hund J are simply extracted by taking the average among the considered localized orbitals: (8) Note that this definition of U is also sometimes referred to as the F 0 Slater integral. We emphasize that this definition is different from the average of the diagonal elements of the Coulomb interaction matrix…”
Section: The Constrained Rpa Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 in Eq. 4 31,56 . This is a more general way of doing because it is applicable to any system, even when bands are entangled.…”
Section: Definition Of the Models For Uranium Dioxide And Ceriummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…II E), as well as the H-Ge hybridization, it is still beneficial to understand the physical value of the interactions in order to both analyze the validity of our range of considered U and of the predictions of PCK and to motivate and guide future material-specific studies. We do this by employing the constrained random-phase approximation (cRPA), [25][26][27][28] performed within the full-potential linearized augmentedplane-wave (FLAPW) method using maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs). 29,30 We use the FLAPW method as implemented in the FLEUR code 31 with the PerdewBurke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation potential 32 for the ground-state calculations.…”
Section: Constrained Random-phase Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the localized states are largely eliminated, and the screening is dominated by itinerant s and p states, which are well described by LDA and GGA. The cRPA is, therefore, -even with these standarad xc potentials -considered a reliable approach to calculate the Hubbard U parameter and its frequency dependence [25,26]. Then, the frequency-dependent effective Coulomb interaction is given schematically by the matrix equation U (ω) = [1 − vP r (ω)] −1 v, where v is the bare Coulomb interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%