1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmva.1998.1788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening among Multivariate Normal Data

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of screening k multivariate normal populations (secondary data) with respect to a control population (primary data) in terms of covariance structure. A screening procedure, developed based upon statistical ranking and selection theory, is designed to include in the selected subset those populations which have the same (or similar) covariance structure as the control population, and exclude those populations which differ significantly. Formulas for computing the probability of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale underlying our technique is that a peak in the RMB beamformer output occurs when training data is contaminated by l z i , is used in step 2 as opposed to the square root of the APR. A number of e orts [3][4][5]17,26,27,[34][35][36] have considered the use of the GIP for selecting representative training data while [8,16] use the GIP normalization for covariance estimation in compound Gaussian clutter. A comparison of the FML, SCRFML/APR, and SCRFML/GIP methods is shown using data from the RLSTAP hi-ÿdelity clutter model [24].…”
Section: Self-censoring Reiterative Fast Maximum Likelihood Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale underlying our technique is that a peak in the RMB beamformer output occurs when training data is contaminated by l z i , is used in step 2 as opposed to the square root of the APR. A number of e orts [3][4][5]17,26,27,[34][35][36] have considered the use of the GIP for selecting representative training data while [8,16] use the GIP normalization for covariance estimation in compound Gaussian clutter. A comparison of the FML, SCRFML/APR, and SCRFML/GIP methods is shown using data from the RLSTAP hi-ÿdelity clutter model [24].…”
Section: Self-censoring Reiterative Fast Maximum Likelihood Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these scenarios, the test cell disturbance covariance matrix, RT, differs significantly from the estimated covariance matrix, R, formed using target-free disturbance realizations from adjacent reference cells. If a large number of test cell data realizations are available, the underlying non-homogeneity is characterized via the eigenvalues of R-1 RT [8]. However, in radar applications, only a single realization of test cell data is usually available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [12] that the distribution information of a class of multivariate probability density functions (PDF) is succinctly determined through an equivalent univariate PDF of a quadratic form. An application of this result is the non-homogeneity detector (NHD) based on the generalized inner product (GIP) [1][2][3][4]8,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%