2016
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmw059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and Primary Care Access for Newly Arrived Paediatric Refugees in Regional Australia: A 5 year Cross-sectional Analysis (2007–12)

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of health conditions in newly arrived refugee children and access to timely heath screening. Methods: Cross-sectional data from screening of refugee children in regional Australia (2007-12) were analysed for health conditions and timeliness of primary care access. The health of 376 newly arrived refugee children (0-15 years) was assessed. Refugee children came from African (45%), Southeast Asian (29%) and Eastern Mediterranean (10%) regions. Access to primary care s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Woodland, Burgner, Paxton, and Zwi () identified key indicators of good health practice for newly arrived refugee children in Australia, which included integrated and coordinated physical, mental health and social care; culturally and linguistically appropriate provision; accessibility; capacity‐building; and user participation. This framework led to a high uptake primary health care screening programme, with 88% of children screened within 1 month and 96% within 6 months of arrival, although mental health issues were not included at that stage (Zwi, Morton, Woodland, Mallitt, & Palasanthrinan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Woodland, Burgner, Paxton, and Zwi () identified key indicators of good health practice for newly arrived refugee children in Australia, which included integrated and coordinated physical, mental health and social care; culturally and linguistically appropriate provision; accessibility; capacity‐building; and user participation. This framework led to a high uptake primary health care screening programme, with 88% of children screened within 1 month and 96% within 6 months of arrival, although mental health issues were not included at that stage (Zwi, Morton, Woodland, Mallitt, & Palasanthrinan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specialist health services provide training forums, screening and management guidelines, access to rapid tertiary-level consultative expertise and specialised Refugee Health Clinics. This collaborative model of care has been shown to be successful in undertaking physical health screening of the entire population (100%) of newly arrived refugee children settling in the region22 (K Zwi, N Morton, L Woodland, et al Screening and primary care access for newly-arrived paediatric refugees in regional Australia: a 5-year cross sectional analysis (2007–2012). J Tropical Pediatrics (Under Resubmission)) 23…”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conflict zones and complex humanitarian emergency settings, the implementation of mass immunization campaigns has resulted in controlling the outbreaks of wild polio virus and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus infections, suggesting that innovative approaches to vaccinate children on the move are needed [127,128]. Cost-effective interventions to address health care disparities and provide high-quality primary and secondary health care for large numbers of recently arrived migrants remains a major priority for many high-income countries [10,11,28,[129][130][131][132].…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps Research Agenda and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%