2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00187.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and Quantification of Aflatoxins and Ochratoxin a in Different Cereals Cultivated in Romania Using Thin‐layer Chromatography‐densitometry

Abstract: The main focus of our study was to implement a rapid, inexpensive and reliable method that could be utilized to check the cereals for safety (i.e., screening for total aflatoxins, as well as individual B1, B2, G1, G2 aflatoxins and ochratoxin A). We developed a protocol by which we were able to isolate mycotoxins from cereals collected from different regions of Romania. After extraction in chloroform, the mycotoxins were separated by thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) and quantified using densitometry. Forty‐th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the LODs for OTA in white and red wine were determined to be 0.41 ± 0.043 and 0.33 ± 0.028 ng mL −1 , respectively, with the IC 50 values of 13.2 ± 1.2 and 10.7 ± 0.7 ng mL −1 , respectively. These LOD values were lower than values in previous reports [9,13,31]. Recently, Flajs et al reported lower detection limits (5 ng L −1 ) for OTA in wine using HPLC and modified ELISA but both of the methods used required complex sample clean-up and pre-concentration steps prior to analysis [37].…”
Section: Detection Of Ota In Beverages (Wine and Fluid Juice)contrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the LODs for OTA in white and red wine were determined to be 0.41 ± 0.043 and 0.33 ± 0.028 ng mL −1 , respectively, with the IC 50 values of 13.2 ± 1.2 and 10.7 ± 0.7 ng mL −1 , respectively. These LOD values were lower than values in previous reports [9,13,31]. Recently, Flajs et al reported lower detection limits (5 ng L −1 ) for OTA in wine using HPLC and modified ELISA but both of the methods used required complex sample clean-up and pre-concentration steps prior to analysis [37].…”
Section: Detection Of Ota In Beverages (Wine and Fluid Juice)contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Chromatographic methods such as thin-layer chromatography (TLC), gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with immunoaffinity columns and fluorescence detection [12][13][14][15][16] provide sensitive and specific techniques, but generally require multiple steps prior to detection. These multiple steps include extraction with organic solvents from complex matrices, extensive sample clean-up, and pre-concentration and sometimes analyte derivatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, better values for determination coefficient (R 2 ), and method performance parameters (LOD and LOQ) were obtained, compared to published data in scientific literature [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…TLC analysis for mycotoxins is still popular for both qualitative and quantitative determinations [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Silica gel layers seem to be the most common stationary phases used for such investigations.…”
Section: Figure 2 Ochratoxins Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction was done according to guidelines by Braicu, Puia, Bodoki, and Socaciu (2008). To 10 g of sample in 250 mL conical flask, 50 mL of chloroform was added and sonicated for 10 minutes at room temperature.…”
Section: Ochratoxin a Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%