Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Alcohol Use in Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Yuma, Paula; Lawson, Karla A.; Velasquez, Mary M.; Sternberg, Kirk von; Maxson, Todd; Garcia, Nilda M.

doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1589

Cited by 84 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous systematic reviews have been published on ASBI in younger adolescents in recent years 37,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] (details given in Appendix 2). Jackson et al's review 37 of ASBI for young people in health settings identified eight controlled trials 53,[80][81][82][83][84][85] for young people.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…53,80,[82][83][84][85][87][88][89][90][91]93 Nine of the included studies 83,84,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93] related to young people aged ≥ 18 years and included a heterogeneous range of interventions from very brief MI to four group sessions of 30-40 minutes, which meant that generalisability BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH NIHR Journals Library www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk could not be ascertained. A review of the literature by Yuma-Guerrero et al 78 around BI in emergency departments in the USA for young people identified seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs). [82][83][84][85][95][96][97] The primary studies included young people aged 12-20 years.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14-15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 10/3002/07. The contractual start date was in October 2011. The final report began editorial review in September 2013 and was accepted for publication in June 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors,...

show abstract

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 99%

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Associations between alcohol consumption and earlier onset of drinking and negative consequences of drinking (as measured by the ESPAD questions) and poorer health and functioning were also observed. This study found ED waiting rooms a source of willing research participants, and this context may also represent a teachable moment to change young people's behavior using either face-to-face or electronic interventions [31,37,38]. The ED also has a high level of staff expertise who are well placed to initiate safeguarding procedures where required and who provide a good point of onward referral to specialist services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Alcohol Consumption, Early-Onset Drinking, and Health-Related Consequences in Adolescents Presenting at Emergency Departments in England

Donoghue

Rose

Boniface

et al. 2017

Journal of Adolescent Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Globally, alcohol use is the leading cause of ill health and life years lost in adolescents, although its clinical impact is often overlooked, particularly in England where most research is based in schools. This study aims to examine the prevalence of alcohol consumption and the association between alcohol consumption and age of onset with health and social consequences among adolescents presenting to emergency departments (EDs). IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONAlcohol consumption and earlier onset of drinking are associated with poorer health and social functioning. The emergency Conflicts of Interest: J.S. is a researcher and clinician who has worked with a range of types of treatment and rehabilitation service-providers. J.S. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. He has also worked with a range of governmental and nongovernmental organizations and with pharmaceutical companies to seek to identify new or improved treatments from whom he and his employer (King's College London) have received honoraria, travel costs, and/or consultancy payments. This includes work with, during past 3 years, Martindale, Reckitt-Benckiser/Indivior, MundiPharma, Braeburn/MedPace and trial medication supply from iGen. His employer (King's College London) has registered intellectual property on a novel buccal naloxone formulation, and he has also been named in a patent registration by a pharma company as inventor of a concentrated nasal naloxone spray. (For a fuller account, see J.S.'s Web

show abstract

“…Previous research has demonstrated the immediate postinjury time is an ideal time to capitalize on a teachable moment with preventive interventions. 28,78 Previous ED screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment approaches have focused on substance use, [79][80][81] with a recent study showing positive findings for intervening for both substance use and youth violence among younger less violence-involved youth. 45,82 Interventions for hospitalized assault-injured youth have shown promise linking hospitalized youth with community-level resources.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Firearm Possession Among Adolescents Presenting to an Urban Emergency Department for Assault

2013

PEDIATRICS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Violence involving firearms is a leading cause of death among US youth ages 14 to 24. The emergency department is the primary medical setting for care of assault-injured youth and an underused but important setting for violence-prevention programs.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Among assault-injured youth seeking emergency department care, firearm possession rates are high, most obtained outside of legal channels. Higher rates of negative retaliatory attitudes and substance use among those youth with firearms increases risk of future lethal violence. abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Firearm violence is a leading cause of death among youth. The objectives of this study were (1) determine firearm possession rates and associated correlates among youth seeking care for assault in an emergency department (ED); (2) understand differences in risk factors for youth with firearm possession; and (3) identify firearm possession characteristics in this population: type, reason for possession, and source of firearms. METHODS:Youth (14 to 24 years old) presenting to a Level 1 ED with assault were administered a computerized screening survey. Validated instruments were administered, measuring demographics, firearm rates and characteristics, attitudes toward aggression, substance use, and previous violence history. RESULTS:Among 689 assault-injured youth, 23% reported firearm possession in the past 6 months. Only 17% of those reporting firearm possession obtained the gun from a legal source; 22% reported ownership of highly lethal automatic/semiautomatic weapons and 37.1% reported having a firearm for protection. Logistic regression analysis identified significant correlates of firearm possession, including male gender, higher socioeconomic status, illicit drug use, recent serious fight, and retaliatory attitudes.CONCLUSIONS: ED assault-injured youth had high rates of firearm possession (23.1%), most of which were not obtained from legal sources. Youth with firearm possession were more likely to have been in a recent serious fight, and to endorse aggressive attitudes that increase their risk for retaliatory violence. Future prevention efforts should focus on minimizing illegal firearm access among high-risk youth, nonviolent alternatives to retaliatory violence, and substance use prevention. Pediatrics 2013;132:213-221 AUTHORS:

show abstract

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Alcohol Use in Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Based on existing evidence, it is not clear whether SBIRT is an effective approach to risky alcohol use among adolescent patients in acute care. Additional research is needed around interventions and implementation.

Cited by 84 publications

References 40 publications

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Alcohol Consumption, Early-Onset Drinking, and Health-Related Consequences in Adolescents Presenting at Emergency Departments in England

Firearm Possession Among Adolescents Presenting to an Urban Emergency Department for Assault

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About