1997
DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.4.913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening differentially expressed cDNA clones obtained by differential display using amplified RNA

Abstract: The major obstacle of differential display is not the technique itself but rather the post-differential display issueof discriminating between false positives and the truly differentially expressed mRNAs. This process is arduous and requires large amounts of RNA. We present and validate a method which allows one to screen putative positives from differential display analysis using only micrograms of total RNA. More importantly, we demonstrate that cDNA probes generated from amplified RNA are representative of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vogeli-Lange et al 50 have introduced reverse-Northern analysis, which screens clones of DD-PCR products by hybridization with labeled original DD-PCR reactions. Poirier et al 51 have used amplified RNA to hybridize with the clone of the DD-PCR product. Other reported methods for screening differentially amplified cDNA products are by affinitycapturing of cDNAs or single-strand conformation polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vogeli-Lange et al 50 have introduced reverse-Northern analysis, which screens clones of DD-PCR products by hybridization with labeled original DD-PCR reactions. Poirier et al 51 have used amplified RNA to hybridize with the clone of the DD-PCR product. Other reported methods for screening differentially amplified cDNA products are by affinitycapturing of cDNAs or single-strand conformation polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DD-PcR provides a powerful method for the rapid identification of differentially expressed genes, and has been used successfully to identify such genes in both the host and the pathogen during infections (35). Benito et al (7) noted that it was difficult to prove to what extent the viral symptoms cause or are a consequence of such changes.…”
Section: Altered Gene Expression: Induction/suppression In Leek Elicimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To screen cDNA fragments cloned in pGEM-T vector for modified expression, we immobilized their PCR-amplified products on two identical Nylon membranes using a dot-blot apparatus and hybridized the membranes to [32] P-labeled cDNAs from either OHT sensitive MVLN or resistant MVLN OHT cells that had grown for 3 days in DCC medium and then for 4 days in DCC medium containing 10 −7 M OHT, according to Poirier et al [24]. Various quantities of ␤-actin PCR product were spotted on membranes to standardize signals.…”
Section: Reverse Northern Blot Analysis Of Clones Generated By Sshmentioning
confidence: 99%