2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Efficient Tandem Organic Solar Cells with Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithms

Abstract: Tandem organic solar cells can potentially drastically improve the power conversion efficiency over single-junction devices. However, there is limited research on device development and often ca. 1% improvement over single-junction devices. Because of the complex nature of organic material compatibility and properties, such as energy-level alignment and maximizing absorption spectra, and the vastness of chemical space, computational guidance is vital. The first part of this work uses a new data set of 1225 don… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65,66 Despite the modest R 2 scores, we find that our top-performing models (RF and HGB) either match or surpass the state-of-the-art for other similar OPV datasets (Figure S2). 22,29 In particular, we achieve better predictive performance (R 2 = 0.5±0.03) using only ECFP and the material properties available in the dataset in comparison to the performance (R 2 = 0.4) achieved when using computed descriptors. 22 We also explored the ability of multi-output models for predicting PCE.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…65,66 Despite the modest R 2 scores, we find that our top-performing models (RF and HGB) either match or surpass the state-of-the-art for other similar OPV datasets (Figure S2). 22,29 In particular, we achieve better predictive performance (R 2 = 0.5±0.03) using only ECFP and the material properties available in the dataset in comparison to the performance (R 2 = 0.4) achieved when using computed descriptors. 22 We also explored the ability of multi-output models for predicting PCE.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…22,29 In particular, we achieve better predictive performance (R 2 = 0.5±0.03) using only ECFP and the material properties available in the dataset in comparison to the performance (R 2 = 0.4) achieved when using computed descriptors. 22 We also explored the ability of multi-output models for predicting PCE. While the most common approach is to predict PCE as the single output, PCE can also be predicted as the product of its components -JSC, VOC, and FF (Equation 1).…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confronted with the challenges of processing high-dimensional, nonlinear, and multivariate data, machine learning excels in extracting key insights from vast experimental and computational datasets [29]. Machine learning extract essential data to make it an invaluable tool for developing structure-property-process models, predicting new material properties, and steering design and optimization [30][31][32]. In organic optoelectronic device research, machine learning signi cantly enhances device performance, particularly in OPVs and OLEDs, through the optimization of HOMO and LUMO levels [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GAs have already been used for a variety of chemical applications 3,8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] , to our knowledge their convergence strategies and multiple hyperparameters have not been thoroughly investigated for molecular discovery. For example, is it better to have a small population size and allow the GA to run for many generations or a large population size with fewer generations?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%