2020
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening everyday health information literacy among four populations

Abstract: Background: People face varying obstacles when interacting with health information in their everyday lives. Objectives: This study aims to examine the applicability of a multidimensional Everyday Health Information Literacy (EHIL) screening tool in detecting people with challenges in accessing, understanding, evaluating and using health information in everyday situations. Methods: Previously collected EHIL screening tool data from Finnish upper secondary school students (n = 217), Finnish young men (n = 1450),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been applied on different populations, including a variety of age groups and nationalities (e.g. [9][10][11], [37][38][39][40]). EHIL is operationalized as a multidimensional construct, which has three dimensions, namely, Motivation, Confidence and Evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been applied on different populations, including a variety of age groups and nationalities (e.g. [9][10][11], [37][38][39][40]). EHIL is operationalized as a multidimensional construct, which has three dimensions, namely, Motivation, Confidence and Evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a concept tightly connected to IBPs, and unique to the field of information science, health information literacy covers competencies relevant in health settings, including those needed to seek, evaluate, understand, and use information. People have been found to face challenges with different aspects of health information literacy (Hirvonen, Enwald, Mayer, et al, 2020). These challenges differ according to individuals' background and life situations (Enwald et al, 2018, Eriksson‐Backa & Nguyen, 2020; Hirvonen, Enwald, Mayer, et al, 2020; Huvila et al, 2019).…”
Section: Illustrative Example Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People have been found to face challenges with different aspects of health information literacy (Hirvonen, Enwald, Mayer, et al, 2020). These challenges differ according to individuals' background and life situations (Enwald et al, 2018, Eriksson‐Backa & Nguyen, 2020; Hirvonen, Enwald, Mayer, et al, 2020; Huvila et al, 2019). Beside the already mentioned issues, the importance of the comprehensibility of information content has been emphasized in IBP research (Baudendistel et al, 2015; Eriksson‐Backa et al, 2021), suggesting that health information could be provided on different levels of complexity and scope in ISs (cf.…”
Section: Illustrative Example Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literasi informasi kesehatan masih dikaitkan dengan hasil kesehatan yang buruk dan penggunaan pelayanan kesehatan yang kurang optimal (Trivedi, Kossakowski, Berneis, Tischler, & Daluiski, 2016). Individu dalam mencari informasi kesehatan sendiri membutuhkan tiga faktor utama, di antaranya kesadaran, akses, dan penilaian (Hirvonen et al, 2020), yang semuanya terdapat dalam keahlian literasi informasi.…”
Section: Individuunclassified