2013
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe systematic review on which this paper is based provided evidence for the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care to update their guideline regarding screening for cervical cancer. In this article we highlight three questions covered in the full review that pertain to the effectiveness of screening for reducing cervical cancer mortality and incidence as well as optimal timing and frequency of screening.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central from 1995 to 2012 for relevant ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
253
0
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
253
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Routine cytology-based screening has contributed to reducing cervical cancer (CC) incidence and mortality worldwide (1,2). Adherence to screening guidelines is considered one of the most important factors for screening effectiveness and efficiency (3)(4)(5)(6), and the European guidelines for quality assurance of CC screening have recognized screening coverage as a key performance indicator (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine cytology-based screening has contributed to reducing cervical cancer (CC) incidence and mortality worldwide (1,2). Adherence to screening guidelines is considered one of the most important factors for screening effectiveness and efficiency (3)(4)(5)(6), and the European guidelines for quality assurance of CC screening have recognized screening coverage as a key performance indicator (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong evidence is now available to show that cervical screening is associated with reductions in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and in mortality and that these benefits can occur even after a single life-time screening test (Peirson et al, 2013). However, for screening to be an effective means of preventing deaths from cervical cancer, it must be widely available, preferably in the form of a well-publicised national programme, women at risk for the disease must participate and attend screening, and those with abnormal smears must be treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the seventh most common cancer in the world, and is more common in less developed countries-where it accounts for more than 85% of the global burden of cancer (Globocan, 2012). Cervical screening offers protective benefits and is associated with a reduction in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and cervical cancer mortality (Peirson et al, 2013). The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF, 2012) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) recommend that all women should begin cervical cancer screening at age 21, every three years for women ages 21-65.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%