2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3443-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in African Americans: Determinants and Rationale for an Earlier Age to Commence Screening

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a highly cost-effective approach to reduce morbidity and mortality of patients, as well as reduce the prevalence of CRC in populations. Current recommendations for CRC screening for the asymptomatic general population begin at age 50 years, an age after which ~95% of cancers occur. Determinants that modify the timing and frequency for screening include a personal or family history of adenomatous polyps or CRC, the age of onset of these colonic lesions, and the presence or p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
126
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
126
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, vigilance for a potentially inherited form of CRC must be strongly considered when a patient aged \50 years is diagnosed with this disease [7]. At present, other than heightened vigilance and evaluation of patients with a strong family history of cancer, there is no current screening strategy to address this \50 years group since it is not cost-effective as with the [age 50 years group [8].Like age, the distribution of and risk of CRC among racial and ethnic groups are not identical, with a clear disparity for African Americans for CRC incidence and death (Table 2) [1,2,9]. In conjunction with the higher incidence and death rates, African American CRC patients are initially diagnosed as many as 5-8 years earlier in age (median age of first diagnosis for African American males/ females = 66/70 years and for Caucasian males/females = 72/77 years, respectively), and have a higher prevalence of proximal precursor adenomas and CRCs as compared to Caucasians [2,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, vigilance for a potentially inherited form of CRC must be strongly considered when a patient aged \50 years is diagnosed with this disease [7]. At present, other than heightened vigilance and evaluation of patients with a strong family history of cancer, there is no current screening strategy to address this \50 years group since it is not cost-effective as with the [age 50 years group [8].Like age, the distribution of and risk of CRC among racial and ethnic groups are not identical, with a clear disparity for African Americans for CRC incidence and death (Table 2) [1,2,9]. In conjunction with the higher incidence and death rates, African American CRC patients are initially diagnosed as many as 5-8 years earlier in age (median age of first diagnosis for African American males/ females = 66/70 years and for Caucasian males/females = 72/77 years, respectively), and have a higher prevalence of proximal precursor adenomas and CRCs as compared to Caucasians [2,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, age is a very powerful predictor for the development of precursor adenomas and CRC, with approximately 94.5 % of all CRCs occurring after age 50, the age at which universal CRC screening is recommended for men and women [2], although 5.5 % of all CRCs occur before age 50, when general screening is not offered or recommended unless there is a strong family history of CRC, when screening is recommended to commence at age 40 [2,3]. Over a 25-year period in a cohort of nearly 400,000 CRC patients, the incidence of CRC was reduced by 0.92 %, although this decline only occurred in subjects [age 50, and largely attributed to screening implementation [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations