2008
DOI: 10.1017/s104161020800673x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for dementia: a review of self- and informant-assessment instruments

Abstract: It is recommended that the MIS, the CIDS and the IQCODE be validated for self-administration in electronic format.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely used in clinical and research settings and has well-defined psychometric properties [20][21][22]. Informant reports using the IQCODE are unaffected by patient level of education and have a similar sensitivity to cognitive impairment as do traditional screening measures like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in clinical and research settings and has well-defined psychometric properties [20][21][22]. Informant reports using the IQCODE are unaffected by patient level of education and have a similar sensitivity to cognitive impairment as do traditional screening measures like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMSE is a useful guide to indicate the possible presence of cognitive impairment; however, it was never intended to be a used to deliver a definitive diagnosis (Folstein et al, 1975). Although extensively used in research (Hawkins et al, 2011) and practice (Cherbuin, Anstey & Lipnicki, 2008), its limitations have been widely reported (see for example Hawkins et al, 2011;Cullen, O'Neill, Evan, Coen, & Lawlor, 2007;Hensel, Angermeyer, & Riedel-Heller, 2007). While an MMSE score below the cut-off score is likely to indicate possible cognitive impairment a score above the cut-off does not necessarily preclude the presence of a cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even good diagnostic tests, which use surrogate markers of pathology, are not to be employed indiscriminately in populations with low prevalence. [7] However, most screens for cognitive impairment rarely highlight,[8] let alone discuss their high false-positive rates when employed in situation of low prevalence.…”
Section: Changes In Dsm-5mentioning
confidence: 99%