2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for hearing, visual and dual sensory impairment in older adults using behavioural cues: A validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A screening tool for dual sensory loss do exist and easy to use[80]. However, to date, there is no evidence about visual changing and hearing aids on cognitive improvement.…”
Section: Dual Sensory Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A screening tool for dual sensory loss do exist and easy to use[80]. However, to date, there is no evidence about visual changing and hearing aids on cognitive improvement.…”
Section: Dual Sensory Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the context of age-related or acquired losses, the term dual sensory impairment (DSI) has been more commonly used (Wittich, Southall, Sikora, Watanabe, & Gagne, 2013). The population prevalence of DSI is estimated to be around 0.74 to 5 per cent (Dawes et al, 2014; Kwon, Kim, Kim, Kwon, & Yu, 2015; Swenor, Ramulu, Willis, Friedman, & Lin, 2013), and dramatically increases up to 20–37 per cent when examining sub-populations of older adults (e.g., Cimarolli & Jopp, 2014; Roets-Merken, Zuidema, Vernooij-Dassen, & Kempen, 2014; Yamada et al, 2015). Among individuals who access rehabilitation services for DSI, between 69 and 85 per cent are over the age of 65 (Dammeyer, 2013; Wittich, Watanabe, & Gagne, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the 31 selected homes, 2313 residents were screened using the Severe Dual Sensory Loss screening tool. 47 Figure 1 shows that 727 (31%) were screened as possibly having DSI, of whom 525 (72%) were excluded either due to severe cognitive problems (n=352; 67%), or because LTC professionals judged that they were too frail to be interviewed (n=173; 33%). The average number of older participants per home was three (minimum 1, maximum 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%