2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-003-0541-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for hemoglobin disorders in Thai pregnant women by England and Frazer's calculation method

Abstract: England and Frazer's calculation method can be an alternative method that can help screen for hemoglobin E disorders in pregnant women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our previous study using England and Frazer's calculation method in screening for Hb disorders in Thai pregnant subjects, good diagnostic properties were determined [3]. Recently, Ittarat et al [4] proposed the possibility of using some modified discriminant functions (DFs) as alternative tools for screening for such disorders among the general population. However, these DFs were originally primarily applied to the differentiation of iron deficiency anemia from betathalassemia.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our previous study using England and Frazer's calculation method in screening for Hb disorders in Thai pregnant subjects, good diagnostic properties were determined [3]. Recently, Ittarat et al [4] proposed the possibility of using some modified discriminant functions (DFs) as alternative tools for screening for such disorders among the general population. However, these DFs were originally primarily applied to the differentiation of iron deficiency anemia from betathalassemia.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions evaluated were: a) F1=0.01xMCH X(MCV)2, b) F2=RDWxMCHx (MCV)2/ Hbx100, c) F3=MCV/RBC, and d) F4= MCH/RBC. The correlation between DFs and HbE was evaluated according to the previous published method of Ittarat et al [4]. DFs demonstrating a significant difference in distinguishing Hb disorders were selected for further evaluation of diagnostic properties (sensitivity, specificity, and false positive and false negative values).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%