1999
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for impaired glucose tolerance. Results from a population-based study in 21,057 individuals.

Abstract: The present study shows that a high-risk screening strategy for IGT targeted solely toward subjects with obesity and/or heredity background of diabetes will fail to detect the majority of subjects with IGT in the general population. The new concept of IFG may not replace the concept of IGT as a risk marker for worsening to diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these studies found that the sensitivity of fasting glucose to identify individuals with impaired glucose tolerance was fairly low (15,16) and that HbA 1c was fairly specific but not very sensitive (17)(18)(19). However, only one of these studies focused specifically on screening for impaired glucose tolerance (15) and none were representative of the general U.S. population.…”
Section: Impact Of the Results Of The Diabetes Prevention Program In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these studies found that the sensitivity of fasting glucose to identify individuals with impaired glucose tolerance was fairly low (15,16) and that HbA 1c was fairly specific but not very sensitive (17)(18)(19). However, only one of these studies focused specifically on screening for impaired glucose tolerance (15) and none were representative of the general U.S. population.…”
Section: Impact Of the Results Of The Diabetes Prevention Program In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent variables in the multivariate models included clinical characteristics associated with IGT in bivariate analysis or from previously published literature (8,11). The first model will be referred to as the "clinical model" and includes those data most likely to be available at a routine clinical encounter, including sex, age, race/ ethnicity, family history of diabetes, BMI, fasting glucose, and blood pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results add important evidence for screening individuals at high risk of IGT based on commonly available clinical data. Previous authors have not advocated using clinical data to predict IGT (11). In a population-based study conducted in Sweden, a high-risk screening strategy based on obesity and family history did not detect the majority of individuals with IGT (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most comparable data come from previous Swedish studies based on thorough registries in health centres and hospital clinics where data from 1977 to 1995 are remarkably similar to ours in all age and gender groups (see Table I) (23 -25). Also, in 1992 -95, the Vä sterbotten Intervention Project (VIP) examined 22,000 subjects aged between 30 and 60 years in one of the two counties included in the present paper, and found the same prevalence of known diabetes (26,27). From mid-Norway a very similar prevalence was reported (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%