Screening for latent TB, HIV, and hepatitis B/C in new migrants in a high prevalence area of London, UK: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundRising rates of infectious diseases in international migrants has reignited the debate around screening. There have been calls to strengthen primary-care-based programmes, focusing on latent TB. We did a cross-sectional study of new migrants to test an innovative one-stop blood test approach to detect multiple infections at one appointment (HIV, latent tuberculosis, and hepatitis B/C) on registration with a General Practitioner (GP) in primary care.MethodsThe study was done across two GP practices attached to hospital Accident and Emergency Departments (A&E) in a high migrant area of London for 6 months. Inclusion criteria were foreign-born individuals from a high TB prevalence country (>40 cases per 100,000) who have lived in the UK ≤ 10 years, and were over 18 years of age. All new migrants who attended a New Patient Health Check were screened for eligibility and offered the blood test. We followed routine care pathways for follow-up.ResultsThere were 1235 new registrations in 6 months. 453 attended their New Patient Health Check, of which 47 (10.4%) were identified as new migrants (age 32.11 years [range 18–72]; 22 different nationalities; time in UK 2.28 years [0–10]). 36 (76.6%) participated in the study. The intervention only increased the prevalence of diagnosed latent TB (18.18% [95% CI 6.98-35.46]; 181.8 cases per 1000). Ultimately 0 (0%) of 6 patients with latent TB went on to complete treatment (3 did not attend referral). No cases of HIV or hepatitis B/C were found. Foreign-born patients were under-represented at these practices in relation to 2011 Census data (Chi-square test −0.111 [95% CI −0.125 to −0.097]; p < 0.001).ConclusionThe one-stop approach was feasible in this context and acceptability was high. However, the number of presenting migrants was surprisingly low, reflecting the barriers to care that this group face on arrival, and none ultimately received treatment. The ongoing UK debate around immigration checks and charging in primary care for new migrants can only have negative implications for the promotion of screening in this group. Until GP registration is more actively promoted in new migrants, a better place to test this one-stop approach could be in A&E departments where migrants may present in larger numbers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0657-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prevalence of and risk factors for active tuberculosis in migrants screened before entry to the UK: a population-based cross-sectional study

“…Such an approach would be welcomed, in view of the documented issues migrants have in accessing health services after arrival in the UK. 29…”

Vaccinations in migrants and refugees: a challenge for European health systems. A systematic review of current scientific evidence

“…Among Asian migrants, it was 0.1% for people born in India, 1.5% for people born in Bangladesh, 1.8% for people born in Pakistan [35], 8.7% for Chinese people [36], and 1.7% among women coming from high prevalence countries [33]. No cases were found among 36 newly arrived migrants who were screened in London, but the sample was too small to draw any conclusion [34].…”

Global Variations and Challenges With Tubercular Uveitis in the Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study

“…5,7 Microbiologic confirmation was low in this cohort, and bronchoscopy with nucleic acid amplification tests of bronchial washings and/or endobronchial ultrasound could be a useful consideration for patients with indeterminate phenotypes. 47 Our study of immigrant status in COTS-1 was inspired by previous reports that highlighted immigrants as a unique subpopulation with a higher risk for TB 48,49 and to explore if this phenomenon was replicated in TBU. Our findings concur with these studies but are limited by the crude ''ever an immigrant'' allocation of immigrant status used.…”