2015
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for liver cancer during transplant waiting list

Abstract: Screening for liver cancer remains an important issue during transplant waiting list. However, the US screening method should be reviewed particularly for Child-Pugh C patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the sensitivity was 33% and specificity was 99%. 54 These results are in line with a recent meta-analysis that showed a sensitivity of 45% for detection of early HCC with a specificity of 84%. 55 There is no large study analyzing the coverage of ultrasound screening for early detection of HCC, mainly in remote areas of Latin America.…”
Section: Screening For Hcc In Latin Americasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, the sensitivity was 33% and specificity was 99%. 54 These results are in line with a recent meta-analysis that showed a sensitivity of 45% for detection of early HCC with a specificity of 84%. 55 There is no large study analyzing the coverage of ultrasound screening for early detection of HCC, mainly in remote areas of Latin America.…”
Section: Screening For Hcc In Latin Americasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, MELD exception points approval rates were similar for HCV and non‐HCV etiologies in a recent South American liver transplantation survey (unpublished data). Thus, we believe this conservative bias does not affect the validity of our results …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…If MELD exception points for HCC were approved, patients were listed with 22 points—plus 1 point every 3 months on the waiting list—until transplantation. It is estimated that HCC MELD exception point approval rates reach 66% in Argentina …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies had applicability concerns about patient selection given inclusion of patients with advanced fibrosis but not cirrhosis. 16, 2124, 30, 33, 37, 44, Most studies used standard reference tests to confirm HCC diagnosis, including CT, MRI, and biopsy; however, 10 studies used AFP > 400 ng/mL, so reference tests were not independent of the surveillance tests. Further, elevated AFP is no longer recommended for diagnosis by AASLD guidelines for HCC diagnosis given imperfect specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%