2016
DOI: 10.7326/m15-2259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Major Depressive Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Abstract: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 36% to 44% of children and adolescents with depression receive treatment, suggesting that the majority of depressed youth are undiagnosed and untreated. 3 …”
Section: Burden Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 36% to 44% of children and adolescents with depression receive treatment, suggesting that the majority of depressed youth are undiagnosed and untreated. 3 …”
Section: Burden Of Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 To focus on the population most likely to benefit from screening and intervention, the scope of the review was narrowed to focus on screening for and treatment of MDD. In addition, studies of paroxetine were excluded because of the 2003 FDA recommendation that this agent not be used to treat MDD in children and adolescents because of reports of possible suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in children and adolescents taking paroxetine for depression.…”
Section: Scope Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they correctly ruled out a probable mental disorder in four out of five (specificity 84% and 87% in intervention and comparison arms), suggesting that they were more accurate at excluding than recognizing probable mental disorder. Sensitivity of GP probable mental disorder assessments is clearly lower than the results of standardized screening tests (Patient Health Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory) [28]. The background prevalence of mental disorders suggests that there may be an added value of using standardized psychosocial screening instruments in primary care for all young people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is little evidence that screening improves mental health outcomes, and concerns exist about stigma and increased strain on health care resources potentially arising from incorrectly pathologizing normal adolescent developmental changes [34]. However, the 2016 U.S. preventive taskforce systematic review on the efficacy of adolescent depression screening in primary care recommended screening because effective interventions are available [28]. They found no evidence of harm from screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 ■ Major studies The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revaluated the evidence on screening and treating children and adolescents for MDD. 12 The current recommendation of the USPSTF reaffi rms the previous recommendation of 2009: to screen for MDD in adolescents, ages 12 to 18, when it is possible to provide an accurate diagnosis, psychotherapy, and adequate follow-up. 2,12 The current recommendation does not recommend any specifi ed therapies.…”
Section: Primary Care Management Of Depression In Children and Adolesmentioning
confidence: 90%