2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for mental disorder comorbidity in Australian alcohol and other drug residential treatment settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
29
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to substance use, comorbidity of mental illness and addiction in Australian residential SUD clients has been reported at 64%-71% (Mortlock, Deane, & Crowe, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to substance use, comorbidity of mental illness and addiction in Australian residential SUD clients has been reported at 64%-71% (Mortlock, Deane, & Crowe, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addiction treatment settings and hospital encounters, alcohol is the number one drug of concern in more than half of encounters; this proportion is also increasing (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007;Mortlock et al, 2011;Xiong Lai & Qi Rong, 2009).…”
Section: Alcohol and Substance Use: Scope Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidity goes unrecognized in high-risk populations (Antony, 2011;Canaway & Merkes, 2010) and contributes to poor outcomes (Mortlock et al, 2011;Sabrina Janine, Petra Sylvia, John, & Mike, 2010).…”
Section: Competing Models and Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Screening suggests the prevalence of co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders (COD) in clients attending residential substance abuse treatment programs in Australia is approximately 71% (Mortlock, Deane & Crowe, 2011). Traditionally COD have been treated in parallel or sequentially, however this often results in poor treatment outcomes (Gil-Rivas & Grella, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%