2017
DOI: 10.7727/wimj.2015.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Non-communicable Diseases at a Walk-in Clinic in Trinidad, West Indies: A Time-motion Cross-sectional Study and Net Present Value Analysis

Abstract: Objective: To determine the feasibility of recommending a screening process for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors, as a national and regional model. Methods: A cross-sectional, six-station process was carried out. It consisted of invitation and consent, history (personal and family history of NCDs), biometrics (waist circumference and body mass index), blood levels (lipids and glycosylated haemoglobin) and urinalysis (microalbuminuria), basic examinations (blood pressure, peripheral neuro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trinidad and Tobago has the highest prevalence of morbidity and mortality for NCDs in the Caribbean (12). Studies conducted on this population often rely on anthropometric data to assess risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the adult population (17)(18)(19)(20). Other research studies rely on FFQ derived food and nutrient intake estimates that have not been validated or are not culturally speci c for this unique population (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trinidad and Tobago has the highest prevalence of morbidity and mortality for NCDs in the Caribbean (12). Studies conducted on this population often rely on anthropometric data to assess risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the adult population (17)(18)(19)(20). Other research studies rely on FFQ derived food and nutrient intake estimates that have not been validated or are not culturally speci c for this unique population (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%