2008
DOI: 10.1021/ac8006335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Organic Phosphorus Compounds in Aquatic Sediments by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to ICP-AES and ESI-MS/MS

Abstract: The structures of organic phosphorous (P) compounds in aquatic sediments are to a large extent unknown although these compounds are considered to play an important role in regulating lake trophic status. To enhance identification of these compounds, a liquid chromatography (LC) method for their separation was developed. The stationary phase was porous graphitic carbon (PGC), and the mobile phases used in the gradient elution were compatible with both inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that Mt UPRT is specific for uracil, as no product formation could be detected for both cytosine and thymine bases (data not shown). This result was confirmed using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) [38]. UPRT from several organisms were also shown to be specific for uracil and some uracil analogues [33], [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that Mt UPRT is specific for uracil, as no product formation could be detected for both cytosine and thymine bases (data not shown). This result was confirmed using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) [38]. UPRT from several organisms were also shown to be specific for uracil and some uracil analogues [33], [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The injected sample volume was 20 µL, which was eluted isocratically with 10 mM ammonium acetate containing 40% acetonitrile at 0.8 ml min −1 flow rate. The LC detector was an ESI coupled to the 3200 Q-Trap (Applied Biosystems MDS SCIEX), employing the ESI-MS/MS parameters as described by others [38]. During the chromatography run, precursor ion scan (Prec) and enhance product ion scan (EPI) were monitored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[58] Monophosphate nucleotides including 3 0 -AMP, 5 0 -AMP, cAMP, 5 0 -GTP, cytidine 5 0 -monophosphate and uridine 5 0 -monophosphate have been identified, but not quantified, in lake sediments from Sweden using liquid chromatography followed by electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectroscopy. [59] Quantification Where they have been measured, it would appear that simple nucleotides only represent a very small proportion of the phosphate pool present in the aquatic environment, with concentrations reported in the picograms to nanograms of phosphorous per litre range. For example, ATP and GTP represented only ,0.1 % of the organic P pool in the surface water in the North Pacific Ocean.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise characterization of various P species in the soil as a dynamic response to nonequilibrium conditions imposed by human activities, such as fertilization, can support a better understanding of reactivity, stability and particularly the plant accessibility of different P forms and provide a basis for best management practices. Several techniques, such as sequential fractionation (Dieter et al, 2010;Condron and Newman, 2011), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Liu et al, 2009;Vestergren et al, 2012;Ahlgren et al, 2013), Raman spectroscopy (Lanfranco, 2003;Vogel et al, 2013) and chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy (De Brabandere et al, 2008;Paraskova et al, 2015), have been developed for P-speciation analysis in soil and sediments. Each one of these techniques can offer specific advantages and disadvantages depending on the phase and complexity of sample matrixes (Kruse et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%