2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Physical Activity in Family PracticeEvaluation of Two Brief Assessment Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The PAVS appears helpful to identify individuals that most need PA counseling from their primary care provider. The ability of SNAP to identify insufficient activity appears moderate, although still comparable to previously evaluated questionnaires that assess PA in primary care (Smith et al, 2005;Meriwether et al, 2006;Topolski et al, 2006). SNAP allows providers to tailor PA counseling because it identifies patients' stage of readiness to change their PA behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PAVS appears helpful to identify individuals that most need PA counseling from their primary care provider. The ability of SNAP to identify insufficient activity appears moderate, although still comparable to previously evaluated questionnaires that assess PA in primary care (Smith et al, 2005;Meriwether et al, 2006;Topolski et al, 2006). SNAP allows providers to tailor PA counseling because it identifies patients' stage of readiness to change their PA behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Both the PAVS and SNAP were developed to be administered in the least amount of time possible without misclassifying activity levels of patients. The two-and three-question PA questionnaires evaluated by Smith et al (2005) (no names for questionnaires were provided), and the Exercise Vital Sign reported by Coleman et al (2012) are the shortest PA questionnaires reported to date, requiring a median of 1-2 min (Smith et al, 2005) and a mean of <1 min (Exercise Vital Sign) to complete. PA questions by Smith et al, however, demonstrated poor agreement with sufficient activity measured by accelerometry (10%), and were evaluated against earlier PA recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-report physical activity included the number of weekly sessions spent: walking for ≥30 minutes; doing other moderate-intensity physical activity for ≥30 minutes (termed "moderate"); and, doing vigorous-intensity physical activity for ≥20 minutes [16]. Further, objectively-measured time spent engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured using the Actigraph GT1M -a dual-axis accelerometer.…”
Section: Physical Activity Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are simple validated screening tests, taking only a few minutes to administer, for use in general practice. [20][21][22] However, time constraints make even these challenging, and this is reflected in their limited use by GPs. GPs also, without exception, perceived assessment to include eliciting all the information they need to manage physical inactivity, which is also time consuming.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%