2018
DOI: 10.1111/add.14150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for problem gambling within mental health services: a comparison of the classification accuracy of brief instruments

Abstract: The optimal brief screening instrument for mental health services wanting to screen for any level of gambling problem is the five-item Brief Problem Gambling Screen (BPGS). Services wanting to employ a shorter instrument or to screen only for more severe gambling problems (moderate-risk/problem gambling) can employ the NODS-CLiP or the three-item BPGS. Services that are only able to accommodate a very brief instrument can employ the Lie/Bet Questionnaire or the two-item BPGS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
44
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this further points to the need to address problematic gambling behaviors in the assessment of suicidality in patients with poor mental health, and that even in the presence of another disorder known to increase suicide risk, gambling may be of interest to screen for and to diagnose at an early stage. Screening for gambling problems has been called for in mental health services, where a number of brief screening tools have been suggested, and where the prevalence of problem gambling is likely markedly higher than in the general population (24). Furthermore, active screening in specialized mental health services may be of particular importance given the association with suicidal behavior seen in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, this further points to the need to address problematic gambling behaviors in the assessment of suicidality in patients with poor mental health, and that even in the presence of another disorder known to increase suicide risk, gambling may be of interest to screen for and to diagnose at an early stage. Screening for gambling problems has been called for in mental health services, where a number of brief screening tools have been suggested, and where the prevalence of problem gambling is likely markedly higher than in the general population (24). Furthermore, active screening in specialized mental health services may be of particular importance given the association with suicidal behavior seen in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The same instrument was also used in the study of problem gambling prevalence in European athletes cited above [5], allowing for comparison with the prevalence data of that study. The Lie/Bet instrument has been described to have a high sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.94) with respect to problem gambling as measured with the well-established Problem Gambling Severity Index in clinical mental health samples [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem gambling was measured using the NODS-CLiP [17], a three-item instrument which has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in the screening of problem gambling [18] [19]. Items included address the following criteria likely to indicate problematic gambling; the patient has ever experienced an episode with increased tolerance for gambling, a reported need to cut back on gambling, or a need to lie to concerned significant others about the extent of her/his gambling.…”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%