Screening for Psychological Distress in Adult Primary Brain Tumor Patients and Caregivers: Considerations for Cancer Care Coordination

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess psychological distress (PD) as scored by the Distress Thermometer (DT) in adult primary brain tumor patients and caregivers (CGs) in a clinic setting and ascertain if any high-risk subgroups for PD exist.Material and methodsFrom May 2012 to August 2013, n = 96 patients and n = 32 CG underwent DT screening at diagnosis, and a differing cohort of n = 12 patients and n = 14 CGs at first recurrence. Groups were described by diagnosis (high grade, low grade, and benign) and English versus non English speaking. Those with DT score ≥4 met caseness criteria for referral to psycho-oncology services. One-way ANOVA tests were conducted to test for between-group differences where appropriate.ResultsAt diagnosis and first recurrence, 37.5 and 75.0% (respectively) of patients had DT scores above the cutoff for distress. At diagnosis, 78.1% of CGs met caseness criteria for distress. All CGs at recurrence met distress criterion. Patients with high-grade glioma had significantly higher scores than those with a benign tumor. For patients at diagnosis, non English speaking participants did not report significantly higher DT scores than English speaking participants.DiscussionPsychological distress is particularly elevated in CGs and in patients with high-grade glioma at diagnosis. Effective PD screening, triage, and referral by skilled care coordinators are vital to enable timely needs assessment, psychological support, and effective intervention.

Family caregivers' level of mastery predicts survival of patients with glioblastoma: A preliminary report

“…Patients with GBM typically come to rely on their family caregivers (eg, spouses, adult children, or close friends) for physical and emotional support. Consequently, many family caregivers experience considerable burden and emotional distress . Caregivers' level of mastery, which can be defined as the feeling of being in control of the care situation, can influence the amount of distress perceived by family caregivers .…”

Evaluation of a telehealth psychological support intervention for people with primary brain tumour and their family members: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

“…High rates of depression and anxiety (40%–50%) have been reported for people with brain tumour (Arnold et al, ) and their family caregivers (31%–59%; Pawl, Lee, Clark, & Sherwood, ). Psychological distress has been found to persist beyond the primary treatment phase, as individuals face an ongoing threat of recurrence and functional decline (Trad et al, ). Despite the significant psychosocial burden of brain tumour, there is a lack of evidence‐based interventions for improving mental health and QoL of people with brain tumour and their family caregivers (Piil, Jarden, & Pii, ; Piil, Juhler, Jakobsen, & Jarden, ).…”

Risk for use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics in partners of glioma patients—A nationwide study covering 19 years of prescriptions

“…Risk factors for stress among glioma caregivers have been suggested to include lower grade, and limited physical functioning of the patient, and lower education and younger age of caregivers . The previous research is however limited by small samples ( N < 120) limiting statistical power, cross‐sectional design, and lack of control groups limiting the possibility to infer causality, self‐reported measures of distress without clinical verification, and potential selection bias due to low inclusion rates of less than 50% of the couples, who are often the most resourceful and perhaps less likely to report distress. There is a need for research documenting the burden of glioma caregiving in large, generalizable study populations, with adequate controls and objective measures of psychological distress …”