2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00003-016-1056-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for six genetically modified soybean lines by an event-specific multiplex PCR method: Collaborative trial validation of a novel approach for GMO detection

Abstract: This study presents a novel approach to detect genetically modified (GM) plant events that are not covered by common GMO screening methods. It is based on a simplified multiplex assay which merges the event-specific real-time PCR methods for the detection of six GM soybean lines (MON 87701, MON 87708, MON 87769, DP-305423, CV-127 and DAS-68416). The use of two different fluorescent dyes facilitates the subsequent analysis for identification of the GM event. The multiplex PCR method was validated in a collabora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapid development of GM crops, to protect consumer’s right of knowing information about GMO products, the detection methods with simplicity, rapidity, and specificity are still needed to be developed. Transgene crop detection usually adopts molecular detection methods such as cPCR, , qPCR, , multi-qPCR, and dPCR. , The premise of detection is to extract gDNA, while DNA extraction methods are usually purification with phenol/chloroform extraction and the extraction process needs harmful reagents and is time-consuming. Additionally, rapid nucleic acid extraction methods have been reported to simplify extraction process, such as those using paper, alumina membrane, silica, cellulose, and Chelex-100 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of GM crops, to protect consumer’s right of knowing information about GMO products, the detection methods with simplicity, rapidity, and specificity are still needed to be developed. Transgene crop detection usually adopts molecular detection methods such as cPCR, , qPCR, , multi-qPCR, and dPCR. , The premise of detection is to extract gDNA, while DNA extraction methods are usually purification with phenol/chloroform extraction and the extraction process needs harmful reagents and is time-consuming. Additionally, rapid nucleic acid extraction methods have been reported to simplify extraction process, such as those using paper, alumina membrane, silica, cellulose, and Chelex-100 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplex detection methods for universal transgenic genes (P-35S, P-RbcS4, T-nos, T-35S, T-pinII, T-E9, T-AHASL, T-ORF23) of 24 LM soybeans approved in many countries had been developed [23]. These methods can be used as primary screening tools to discriminate suspicious samples whether they contain LMO or not, though further analysis is needed to verify event from LMO containing samples and several multiplex PCR methods of LM soybeans were reported [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we determined LOD 95% by applying a statistical model for calculating the probability of detection (POD) across laboratories. Since its introduction by Uhlig et al [27], this model has already been used several times to determine the sensitivity of real-time PCR assays [32][33][34][35][36][37]. Qualitative results obtained for the seven dilution steps of the DNA isolate from roe deer meat were used to determine the laboratory standard deviation σ L, and the LOD 95% for the median laboratory, as described previously [27].…”
Section: Lod 95% Derived From the Mixed Model For The Pod Curvementioning
confidence: 99%