2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting: using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
296
1
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
296
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, previous studies from this sample looking at the AUC between two measures of psychopathology such as the AUC between the quantitative attention problems score of the Child Behavior Checklist (which does not purport to measure ADHD per se) and the presence of DSM-IV ADHD were between .841 and .901 . Other studies measuring the AUC between a quantitative rating scale for a particular disorder and the presence or absence of its corresponding DSM diagnosis have been found to be .980 and above (Furlanetto, Mendlowicz, & Romildo Bueno, 2005;Mennin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous studies from this sample looking at the AUC between two measures of psychopathology such as the AUC between the quantitative attention problems score of the Child Behavior Checklist (which does not purport to measure ADHD per se) and the presence of DSM-IV ADHD were between .841 and .901 . Other studies measuring the AUC between a quantitative rating scale for a particular disorder and the presence or absence of its corresponding DSM diagnosis have been found to be .980 and above (Furlanetto, Mendlowicz, & Romildo Bueno, 2005;Mennin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 We included only patients whose primary diagnosis was social phobia (i.e., the most severe disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule Adult Version [ADIS-IV] rating 14 ). We excluded patients with a history of neurologic disease, severe medical conditions, psychotic and affective disorders, promin ent risk of self-harm, current substance-related disorders, PTSD, traumatic exposure or personality disorders except for avoidant personality disorder (APD) (as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders [SCID-II] 15 ).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it can be used to reliably classify individuals with and without social anxiety disorder as well as patients with generalized versus nongeneralized social anxiety disorder. [10] Using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses, [10] found that a score of 30 on the clinician-administered LSAS provided the best balance of sensitivity (the likelihood of having a positive test result among individuals with a positive diagnosis) and specificity (the likelihood of having a negative test result among individuals without the diagnosis) for differentiating patients with social anxiety disorder from healthy controls. Similarly, a score of 60 provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for classifying patients with generalized and nongeneralized social anxiety disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%