2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for the ultra-high risk state in a youth mental health service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to include as many adolescents as possible with a sensitivity not lower than 0.80 and an acceptable level of false positives. Since a false positive is not followed by an invasive procedure, but by an interview, we chose as moderate a specificity as permissible, eliminating false positives of those who scored ≥ the chosen cutoff score on the PQ-16 [30,37]. Crosstabs between the CAARMS outcome and the determined cutoffs of the PQ-16, YSR and CBCL were used to determine the proportions of true and false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aimed to include as many adolescents as possible with a sensitivity not lower than 0.80 and an acceptable level of false positives. Since a false positive is not followed by an invasive procedure, but by an interview, we chose as moderate a specificity as permissible, eliminating false positives of those who scored ≥ the chosen cutoff score on the PQ-16 [30,37]. Crosstabs between the CAARMS outcome and the determined cutoffs of the PQ-16, YSR and CBCL were used to determine the proportions of true and false positives and negatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PQ-16 is used mainly in a two-step screening procedure with the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States CAARMS; [26], an interview for determining a CAARMS classification of UHR or PT [23,27,28]. Although the PQ-16 has acceptable psychometrics in youth seeking help, its specificity rates need to be improved [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%