2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-020-01183-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Trauma in Pediatric Primary Care

Abstract: Purpose of Review Provided the high prevalence of trauma exposure in childhood as well as the risk for morbidity, this article examines evidence, a recommended approach, and key implementation factors relevant to screening for trauma in pediatric primary care. Recent Findings A standardized approach to trauma screening is possible, but previous attempts have relied heavily upon exposure screening and failed to guide an individualized response specific to the impact of trauma on the child and family. Trauma s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…116,117 The Pediatric Traumatic Stress Screening Tool in the Intermountain Care Process Model has been recently developed to screen for pediatric traumatic stress in the primary care setting, either as a universal screen or with targeted screening when traumas are known. 118 A limitation of ACE and SDoH screening tools is their lack of nuance: they identify risk factors that have been derived from epidemiological studies, not outcomes at the individual level. 129,130 Those outcomes are the result of the physiologic response to adversities.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116,117 The Pediatric Traumatic Stress Screening Tool in the Intermountain Care Process Model has been recently developed to screen for pediatric traumatic stress in the primary care setting, either as a universal screen or with targeted screening when traumas are known. 118 A limitation of ACE and SDoH screening tools is their lack of nuance: they identify risk factors that have been derived from epidemiological studies, not outcomes at the individual level. 129,130 Those outcomes are the result of the physiologic response to adversities.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs because current sports injury prevention research methods primarily derive from extractive public health models, extrapolating from detailed self-report surveys and survivor testimonies to estimate problem size and scope 5. Developed to study accidental sports injuries, these methods may re-traumatise athlete-survivors of interpersonal violence through trauma reactivation 4 6 7. Further, this methodology does not guarantee anonymity or necessarily facilitate access to resources and treatment, which is an essential component of ethical trauma screening.…”
Section: Methodological and Ethical Challenges Of Studying Interperso...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Because responses to adverse experiences vary widely, some argue that screening for trauma symptoms, rather than for traumatic experiences alone, is preferable because it would identify children who would most benefit from trauma-specific treatment. 36 Large-scale efforts are underway to improve trauma-informed care within primary care and pediatrics. 37,38 Applying updated treatment recommendations for trauma-related conditions remains prudent.…”
Section: Diagnostic Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%