2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41999-018-0090-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for urinary incontinence in acute care for elders unit: comparative performance analysis of Katz’s ADL and ICIQ-UI-SF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All but two articles [71,73] assessed the reliability of the tool (table 4); test-retest reliability (n = 16), internal consistency (n = 14), inter-rater reliability (n = 4). Twelve studies explored the tool's validity (table 5); content validity (n = 5), criterion validity (n = 3), construct validity (n = 11).…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All but two articles [71,73] assessed the reliability of the tool (table 4); test-retest reliability (n = 16), internal consistency (n = 14), inter-rater reliability (n = 4). Twelve studies explored the tool's validity (table 5); content validity (n = 5), criterion validity (n = 3), construct validity (n = 11).…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the three identified screening questionnaires, the most frequently psychometrically assessed questionnaire was the IPSS, as demonstrated in table 3 [n = 11; 3 x AUASI [50,55,56]; 8 x IPSS [52,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63], where five articles assessed the English version of the tool and six articles assessed other language versions including: Mandarin [59], Turkish [52], Spanish [61,62], Japanese [58] and Arabic [57]. Nine articles assessed the psychometric properties of the ICIQ-UI SF [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72], where five assessed the English version [64,[69][70][71] and five articles explored alternative language versions including: Arabic [67], Slovene [66], Japanese [65], Italian [68], Chinese and Malay [64]. Only two articles were found which assessed the validity and reliability of the B-SAQ [73,74], both of which used English versions of the tool.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations