2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-014-0608-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening instruments in child and adolescent psychiatry: general and methodological considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the success of preventive approaches also depends on a sufficiently high rate of target persons who are reached by it. Thus, to reach also CHR persons who do not actively seek help for their mental problems, more research in the general population is needed to develop ethically justified means such as well-validated and reliable screeners [68] on the basis of those already proposed [49,66,85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the success of preventive approaches also depends on a sufficiently high rate of target persons who are reached by it. Thus, to reach also CHR persons who do not actively seek help for their mental problems, more research in the general population is needed to develop ethically justified means such as well-validated and reliable screeners [68] on the basis of those already proposed [49,66,85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognostic testing is commonly used in preventive medicine . While a screening test should identify all individuals who may develop the disease , a prognostic test is used to predict the development or not of the future disease when a patient shows some heralding signs or symptoms. Examples of predictive testing in somatic medicine include fasting glucose and oral glucose tolerance test and glycated haemoglobin to detect subjects at high risk for diabetes (pre‐diabetes or intermediate hyperglycaemia) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive values are not fixed indicators of a test performance, but are affected by the prevalence of the condition . Within help‐seeking CHR+ samples, the ability of the above psychometric instruments to identify true positives is accumulating to 29% at 2‐year follow‐up – a finding comparable to other preventive approaches in medicine .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experts warned that instruments that yield false negatives could lead to lack of adequate treatment, while those that yield false positives could lead to unjustified medicalization and cruel stigmatization of those erroneously found to be at risk [66,[68][69][70]. Other challenges mentioned by our panel were language difficulties, the misleading capture of transitory rather than with Arabic numerals corresponding to the challenges within each theme, by rank.…”
Section: Design and Validation Of Screening Toolsmentioning
confidence: 96%