2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1444-6162.2003.00111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of 239 medicinal plant species for allelopathic activity using the sandwich method

Abstract: Keywords: allelopathy, leaf litter leacheate, plant species, sandwich method. time-consuming bioassay method and could be used to screen a large number of samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
163
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
163
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While the microbioassay requires a smaller area for its execution, but is capable of evaluating a larger number of samples, the conventional bioassay with Petri plates requires more space in the germination chamber; an additional benefit regarding the sandwich-type assay, which uses 6-well plates, even larger, and spends more medium than the microbioassay (Fujii et al, 2003; This method represents an obvious alternative that optimizes resources/analyses and requires a minimum amount of donor extract in laboratories with little infrastructure, in comparison with what has been exposed by Fuji et al (2003) and Miyaura (2012). However, a standardization process to validate the efficacy of the method, with a larger number of species and types of recipient seeds, would provide reliable data on this new method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the microbioassay requires a smaller area for its execution, but is capable of evaluating a larger number of samples, the conventional bioassay with Petri plates requires more space in the germination chamber; an additional benefit regarding the sandwich-type assay, which uses 6-well plates, even larger, and spends more medium than the microbioassay (Fujii et al, 2003; This method represents an obvious alternative that optimizes resources/analyses and requires a minimum amount of donor extract in laboratories with little infrastructure, in comparison with what has been exposed by Fuji et al (2003) and Miyaura (2012). However, a standardization process to validate the efficacy of the method, with a larger number of species and types of recipient seeds, would provide reliable data on this new method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sandwich method procedure was adopted from Fujii et al (2003), Fujii et al(2004), and Morikawa et al(2012). The amount of leaf litter sample (either 10 mg or 50 mg) was placed into a six well (~10 cm 2 area per well) multidish plate (36 mm × 18 mm, Nalge Nunc Int.)…”
Section: Sandwich Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the previous preliminary studies need extraction procedure, and suitable for a small number of samples. The sandwich method are very useful allelopathic screening for leaf leachate under laboratory conditions (Fujii et al, 2003). The sandwich method is a reliable, fast, easy bioassay and can screen a large number of samples from leaf litter leachates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of Fujii et al (2003) agar growth medium in the sandwich method was found to be the best method for radish seedling growth. Agar (0.5% w/v) was also applied as the growth medium.…”
Section: Preparation Of Growth Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, different labora-tory screening techniques have been applied to measure allelopathy without the interference of resource competition. The sandwich method (Fujii et al 2003), agar medium selection (Fujii 1992;Wu et al 1999), the plant box method (Fujii 1994;Nishihara et al 2005) and relay seedling (Navarez and Olofsdotter 1996) have been tested for bioassays. The sandwich method is an effective tool to screen for allelopathic properties under laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%