2010
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201000387
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of cellulases for biofuel production: Online monitoring of the enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose using high‐throughput scattered light detection

Abstract: The legend of Figure 8 misleadingly refers to Figure 3B. The correct link should be Figure 4B. Please find the correct legend below: Figure 8. Influence of pH on the cellulase activity. (A) Scattered light intensity during the hydrolysis of α-cellulose at different pH. (B) Influence of pH on the cellulase activity using α-cellulose as cellulosic substrate. Open symbols indicate no changes in scattered light intensity (cellulase adsorption, Fig. 4B) and therefore no cellulase activities were observed. Predicted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Figure 9 illustrates the aforementioned differences in cellulose hydrolysis rates (Figure 7) for various substrates and pretreatments. In addition, it confirms the findings of other authors: (i) since smaller cellulose particle sizes lead to increased cellulase adsorption [25] (see previous section), hydrolysis rates increase with decreasing cellulose particle size [22-24]; (ii) since a reduction in CrI leads to increased cellulase adsorption and higher reactivity of adsorbed cellulases, hydrolysis rates correlate inversely with the CrI of the applied cellulose [24,26]. It should be noted that Figure 9 shows an empirical correlation for the conducted hydrolysis experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Figure 9 illustrates the aforementioned differences in cellulose hydrolysis rates (Figure 7) for various substrates and pretreatments. In addition, it confirms the findings of other authors: (i) since smaller cellulose particle sizes lead to increased cellulase adsorption [25] (see previous section), hydrolysis rates increase with decreasing cellulose particle size [22-24]; (ii) since a reduction in CrI leads to increased cellulase adsorption and higher reactivity of adsorbed cellulases, hydrolysis rates correlate inversely with the CrI of the applied cellulose [24,26]. It should be noted that Figure 9 shows an empirical correlation for the conducted hydrolysis experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These properties, in particular, are the degree of polymerization, accessibility and crystallinity [15-18]. Cellulose accessibility, which is determined by cellulose particle size (external surface area) and porosity (internal surface area) [15,19], is the most important factor for hydrolysis [15,18,20-24]. This accessibility reflects the total surface area available for direct physical contact between cellulase and cellulose and, therefore, influences cellulase adsorption as well as the rate and extent of cellulose hydrolysis [21,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the fermentation conditions will have to match the pH-optima of cellulases around 4.8. This prerequisite applies more for U. maydis than for A. terreus as commonly available cellulases would not perform well under pH values below 3 [38]. In addition, the advantage of the yeast-like, single cell growth of U. maydis will facilitate a scale-up in larger stirred tank bioreactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 Schematic representation of the BioLector [36] In contrast to other methods the shaking of the microtiter plate does not have to be stopped during the measurement. Taking samples during the reaction is not necessary and sources of error are avoided.…”
Section: Scattered Light Measurement Using Biolectormentioning
confidence: 99%