1986
DOI: 10.1159/000472614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Chelating Agents for Chemolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p values (Table 1). It agrees with the calculated behaviour of struvite in solution estimated by Verplaetse et al (1985Verplaetse et al ( ,1986, Snoeyink and Jenkins (1980) and Stumm and Morgan (1981). Further calculations involving data from this experiment yield an apparent pK.p = 12.76±0.56.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p values (Table 1). It agrees with the calculated behaviour of struvite in solution estimated by Verplaetse et al (1985Verplaetse et al ( ,1986, Snoeyink and Jenkins (1980) and Stumm and Morgan (1981). Further calculations involving data from this experiment yield an apparent pK.p = 12.76±0.56.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is a serious pathological condition. The calculated behaviour of struvite at varying pH values in solution has also been reported and expressed in various forms (Snoeyink and Jenkins (1980); Stumm and Morgan (1981); Verplaetse et al (1985Verplaetse et al ( ,1986). The aim of the work reported in this paper was to determine at what point in the lagoon system struvite precipitation was likely to occur, by experimentally measuring the solubility of struvite under conditions close to the wastewater in the lagoons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%